How to Choose Between App Router and Pages Router in Next.js 15: A Complete Guide for SEO-Conscious Developers

Are you wrestling with the decision between Next.js App Router and Pages Router? You're not alone. Many developers find themselves caught between the modern features of App Router and the battle-tested stability of Pages Router, especially when SEO is a crucial consideration.

In this comprehensive guide, we'll help you make an informed decision that aligns with your project needs while ensuring optimal search engine visibility.

Understanding the Core Differences

Next.js offers two distinct routing systems: the newer App Router and the traditional Pages Router. While both serve the same fundamental purpose of handling navigation in your application, they differ significantly in their approach and capabilities.

App Router: The Modern Approach

The App Router represents Next.js's vision for the future of web development. It leverages React's latest features and introduces several modern concepts:

  • Server Components by Default: Components are server-rendered unless explicitly marked with 'use client'

  • Nested Layouts: More flexible layout management with shared UI elements

  • Streaming with Suspense: Built-in support for streaming server-side rendering

  • Advanced Caching: More granular control over data caching strategies

Pages Router: The Proven Solution

The Pages Router has been the backbone of Next.js applications for years, offering:

  • File-system Based Routing: Simple and intuitive routing based on files in the pages directory

  • Automatic Static Optimization: Built-in static page generation for improved performance

  • API Routes: Straightforward backend API creation within your Next.js application

  • Stable and Well-documented: Years of production testing and community knowledge

SEO Implications: A Critical Consideration

One of the most pressing concerns when choosing between routers is their impact on SEO. Let's address this head-on:

App Router SEO Considerations

The App Router introduces Server Components as the default, which is excellent for SEO as it ensures content is readily available to search engine crawlers. However, some developers have expressed concerns about the 'use client' directive:

"Concern that marking components with 'use client' leads to client-side rendering, negatively impacting SEO," as noted in recent community discussions.

The good news? These concerns are largely unfounded. Even with client components, the App Router maintains strong SEO capabilities through:

  1. Hybrid Rendering: Server-side rendering for initial page load, regardless of client components

  2. Metadata API: Built-in tools for managing SEO metadata

  3. Automatic Static Optimization: Static generation of pages where possible

Pages Router SEO Benefits

The Pages Router has proven its SEO effectiveness through:

  • Predictable Server-Side Rendering: Clear distinction between SSR and client-side rendering

  • Built-in Head Management: Easy metadata management with next/head

  • Static Generation: Automatic static optimization for better crawling

Making the Right Choice: Key Decision Factors

Choose App Router When:

  1. Building a New Project

    • You're starting fresh without legacy constraints

    • You want to leverage the latest React features

    • Your team is ready to learn new concepts

  2. Need Advanced Features

    • Nested layouts are crucial for your UI

    • You require streaming server-side rendering

    • Complex data fetching patterns are necessary

  3. Long-term Investment

    • You're building for the future

    • Performance optimization is a top priority

    • You want access to the latest Next.js features

Stick with Pages Router When:

  1. Maintaining Existing Projects

    • You have a stable application that works well

    • Your team is familiar with the current setup

    • Time-to-market is crucial

  2. Prioritizing Stability

    • You need proven, production-tested solutions

    • Your project has strict stability requirements

    • You want to avoid potential migration issues

  3. Simple Application Needs

    • Your routing requirements are straightforward

    • You don't need nested layouts

    • Basic SSR and static generation suffice

Practical Implementation Tips

Optimizing SEO in App Router

To ensure optimal SEO performance with App Router, follow these best practices:

  1. Implement Root Layout SEO

// app/layout.tsx
import { Metadata } from 'next'

export const metadata: Metadata = {
  title: {
    template: '%s | Your Site Name',
    default: 'Your Site Name',
  },
  description: 'Your site description',
  robots: {
    index: true,
    follow: true,
  },
}

export default function RootLayout({
  children,
}: {
  children: React.ReactNode
}) {
  return (
    <html lang="en">
      <body>{children}</body>
    </html>
  )
}
  1. Strategic Use of Client Components

// Keep your page.tsx server-side
export default async function Page() {
  return (
    <main>
      <h1>Server Component</h1>
      <ClientInteractivity />
    </main>
  )
}

// Separate interactive elements into client components
'use client'
function ClientInteractivity() {
  return <button onClick={() => console.log('clicked')}>Click me</button>
}

Optimizing SEO in Pages Router

For Pages Router implementations, consider:

  1. Consistent Metadata Management

// pages/_app.tsx
import Head from 'next/head'

function MyApp({ Component, pageProps }) {
  return (
    <>
      <Head>
        <title>Your Site Name</title>
        <meta name="description" content="Your site description" />
      </Head>
      <Component {...pageProps} />
    </>
  )
}

export default MyApp
  1. Leverage getStaticProps for SEO

// pages/blog/[slug].tsx
export async function getStaticProps({ params }) {
  const post = await getPost(params.slug)
  return {
    props: {
      post,
      // Add metadata for SEO
      metadata: {
        title: post.title,
        description: post.excerpt,
      },
    },
  }
}

Community Insights and Real-world Experience

The Next.js community has shared valuable insights about both routing systems. According to recent discussions, many developers express concerns about App Router's stability in production environments.

Common Challenges and Solutions

  1. App Router Challenges

    • Stability Issues: Some developers report unexpected behavior in production

    • Learning Curve: New concepts like Server Components require additional learning

    • Migration Complexity: Moving from Pages to App Router can be challenging

  2. Pages Router Challenges

    • Limited Layout Options: Less flexible than App Router's nested layouts

    • Feature Access: Missing out on newer Next.js features

    • Future-proofing: Potential technical debt as the framework evolves

Best Practices for Either Choice

Regardless of which router you choose, follow these guidelines:

  1. Structure Your Application Thoughtfully

    • Keep components organized and well-documented

    • Maintain clear separation between server and client code

    • Use appropriate data fetching methods

  2. Monitor Performance

    • Regularly check Core Web Vitals

    • Use built-in Next.js analytics

    • Monitor SEO metrics through Google Search Console

  3. Plan for the Future

    • Document your routing decisions

    • Keep your dependencies updated

    • Stay informed about Next.js updates

Conclusion

The choice between App Router and Pages Router isn't just about technical capabilities—it's about aligning with your project's needs, team expertise, and SEO requirements. While App Router represents the future of Next.js with its modern features and improved performance capabilities, Pages Router remains a reliable choice for teams prioritizing stability and simplicity.

Remember:

  • Choose App Router for new projects wanting to leverage modern features

  • Stick with Pages Router for stable, straightforward applications

  • Prioritize SEO considerations regardless of your choice

By understanding these differences and following the implementation guidelines above, you can make an informed decision that serves your project's needs while maintaining strong SEO performance.

For more detailed information, consult the official Next.js documentation and stay engaged with the community discussions for real-world insights and updates.

Raymond Yeh

Raymond Yeh

Published on 13 February 2025

Get engineers' time back from marketing!

Don't let managing a blog on your site get in the way of your core product.

Wisp empowers your marketing team to create and manage content on your website without consuming more engineering hours.

Get started in few lines of codes.

Choosing a CMS
Related Posts
Starting a New Next.js 14 Project: Should You Use App Router or Page Router?

Starting a New Next.js 14 Project: Should You Use App Router or Page Router?

Next.js 14: App Router vs Page Router? Discover the key differences and find out which routing solution best suits your dynamic web project.

Read Full Story
SSG vs SSR in Next.js: Making the Right Choice for Your Application

SSG vs SSR in Next.js: Making the Right Choice for Your Application

Optimize your Next.js application with the right rendering strategy. Learn when to choose SSG, SSR, or ISR based on your content needs and performance goals.

Read Full Story
SEO Checklist for Next.js with App Router

SEO Checklist for Next.js with App Router

Boost your Next.js app's SEO with our guide! Learn to overcome technical challenges, use SSR/SSG, optimize images, and more to enhance search engine visibility.

Read Full Story
Loading...