HubSpot CMS vs Keystone

HubSpot's free plan allows you to build a website without paying, although there are some limitations.

HubSpot provides a robust set of marketing tools, including SEO and blogging features, making it attractive for inbound marketing.

HubSpot's Smart Content feature allows personalization based on visitor data, creating tailored user experiences.

The drag-and-drop interface is user-friendly for non-developers, allowing easy updates and page creation.

Strong security features including SSL and automatic backups bolster user confidence in the platform.

Offers a wide selection of marketing features integrated into the CRM, enhancing lead generation.

KeystoneJS allows rapid API development with GraphQL and eliminates boilerplate code, making it efficient for developers.

The platform is favored for its flexibility and ease of integrating with various frontend tools.

Users appreciate the customizability and strong community support for KeystoneJS.

KeystoneJS provides clear documentation for setting up and using the platform, which helps ease the onboarding process for developers.

The intuitive admin UI of KeystoneJS is highlighted as a significant positive by many users.

Many find KeystoneJS advantageous for creating complex relationships between data models due to its Schema design.

The learning curve can be steep for users unfamiliar with HubSpot's unique interface and setup process.

The user interface can be overwhelming and inflexible, making it harder for new users to navigate.

Significant price jumps between plans can be a drawback for small businesses with limited budgets.

Backup and recovery options are limited compared to some other CMS platforms.

Lacks native eCommerce features, which can be a limitation for businesses focused on selling products.

The CMS has a rigid editor which can hinder precise customization attempts.

Users have mentioned a steep learning curve for newcomers that may hinder adoption.

Installation issues on certain setups and the dependency on external databases can be a drawback.

Some users have reported performance issues when scaling applications, especially with complex queries.

Limited built-in functionality compared to some other headless CMS platforms may require additional development work.

Integration with frontend frameworks, while possible, may not be as seamless compared to other CMSs like Strapi.

There have been various bug reports that suggest instability for certain features within KeystoneJS.

Flexible layout options allow for custom module creation in the drag-and-drop editor.

The CRM integration with the CMS provides a holistic view of customer interactions.

The block-based editor is straightforward for marketers to utilize.

Allows for easy dynamic content generation through custom coding.

Users feel that the platform is overall good for businesses looking for integrated solutions.

The new-and-improved editor experience is expected to enhance usability.

KeystoneJS allows customization of the admin UI, enabling users to tailor the interface to their needs.

Users appreciate Keystone's flexible API, which enables easy integration into various applications.

Many developers find KeystoneJS easy to set up and efficient for rapid application development.

The extension capabilities of KeystoneJS are highly regarded, allowing for advanced customization.

Users reported that the autosave feature is a significant advantage during content creation.

Keystone's workflow management features are praised for streamlining content approval processes.

Lack of flexibility in creating layouts without developer input.

Cumbersome and lag-prone landing page creation tools.

Challenges in finding capable HubSpot developers.

Users report difficulties in managing content without coding skills.

Editing in the HubSpot CMS can be complex for non-technical users.

Standard blog features may be limited unless extensive customization is applied.

Some users find the media management capabilities lacking, particularly in comparison to other CMS options.

Developers struggle with implementing custom fields due to complexity, impacting the user experience.

Users have reported difficulties in managing image assets effectively within Keystone's current setup.

The system lacks intuitive image editing features, complicating the editing process for users.

Some users mentioned the UI feels dated and could benefit from more modern design elements.

Missing advanced media features like bulk uploads and better organization frustrate users.

Easy setup for those familiar with marketing tools.

Integration with CRM adds value to marketing efforts.

Customizable by developers; can be tailored to specific needs.

HubSpot integrates well with other marketing tools, creating a seamless workflow.

Developers appreciate the flexibility and control offered by KeystoneJS for custom projects.

The crash course on KeystoneJS provides a step-by-step guide that eases the onboarding process.

The improved migration commands have made database migrations more straightforward and user-friendly.

Keystone's community support proves beneficial for troubleshooting integration issues.

Keystone allows for easy integration of various database systems such as MongoDB and PostgreSQL.

The clear installation process of Keystone is praised, allowing projects to get up and running quickly.

Lacks flexibility without custom development.

Building complex integrations can be a challenge.

API integration issues reported by users.

Duplication of records can complicate integration processes.

Some users reported issues with localization support in KeystoneJS.

Users find it difficult to manage many-to-many relationships effectively with Keystone.

Lack of built-in localization features complicates multi-language site setups.

Some developers encounter difficulties with complex setups and configurations for unique use cases.

Certain users found the learning curve steep due to the complexity of the framework.

Users reported issues with integrating third-party plugins without detailed documentation.