Suspense vs "use client" - Understanding the Key Differences in Next.js 15

Suspense vs "use client"

You've been diving into Next.js & React development and encountered both Suspense and the "use client" directive. But now you're scratching your head, wondering which one to use for loading states and component rendering. Should you stick with a simple loading.tsx file, or is Suspense the better choice? And what's all this talk about bundle sizes when using "use client"?

If you're feeling confused about these choices, you're not alone. Many developers in the Next.js community have expressed similar concerns about making the right architectural decisions for their applications.

Understanding the Fundamentals

What is Suspense?

Suspense is a React feature that helps manage loading states when fetching data or loading components. Think of it as a safety net that catches your components while they're loading and shows a fallback UI until they're ready.

Here's a basic example of how Suspense works:

import { Suspense } from 'react';

function MyApp() {
  return (
    <Suspense fallback={<LoadingSpinner />}>
      <DataFetchingComponent />
    </Suspense>
  );
}

In this case, users see a loading spinner while DataFetchingComponent fetches its data. Once the data is ready, Suspense automatically swaps in the actual component.

What is "use client"?

The "use client" directive is a Next.js feature that tells the framework to treat a component as client-side only. When you add this directive, you're essentially saying, "This component needs to run in the browser, not on the server."

Here's how you implement it:

'use client';

import { useState } from 'react';

function InteractiveComponent() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  
  return (
    <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
      Clicked {count} times
    </button>
  );
}

This directive is particularly important in Next.js 15's server-first approach, where components are server-side by default. When you need client-side interactivity, like handling user clicks or managing local state, "use client" is your go-to solution.

Key Differences and When to Use Each

1. Data Fetching and Loading States

Suspense Approach

Suspense excels at handling asynchronous operations in a more elegant way. It can manage loading states across multiple nested components simultaneously, which is particularly useful for complex UIs.

// Using Suspense for nested loading states
<Suspense fallback={<PageSkeleton />}>
  <Header />
  <Suspense fallback={<ContentSkeleton />}>
    <MainContent />
    <Suspense fallback={<CommentsSkeleton />}>
      <Comments />
    </Suspense>
  </Suspense>
</Suspense>
Copy
"use client" Approach

With "use client", you'll typically handle loading states manually using local state:

'use client';

import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';

function DataComponent() {
  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true);
  const [data, setData] = useState(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    fetchData()
      .then(result => {
        setData(result);
        setIsLoading(false);
      });
  }, []);

  if (isLoading) return <LoadingSpinner />;
  return <div>{data}</div>;
}

2. Performance Implications

Bundle Size Considerations

One of the main concerns in the Next.js community is the impact of "use client" on bundle size. As noted in various community discussions, when you mark a component with "use client", it and all its dependencies must be included in the client-side JavaScript bundle.

This can lead to:

  • Larger initial page loads

  • Increased Time to Interactive (TTI)

  • Higher bandwidth usage

Server vs Client Components

Suspense works well with both server and client components, while "use client" forces a component to be client-side. This distinction is crucial for performance optimization:

// Server Component (default in Next.js 15)
async function ServerComponent() {
  const data = await fetchData(); // Runs on server
  return <div>{data}</div>;
}

// Client Component
'use client';
function ClientComponent() {
  const [data, setData] = useState(null);
  // Data fetching happens in browser
  // More network requests, more client-side processing
}

3. Developer Experience and Code Organization

Using Suspense

Suspense provides a more declarative way to handle loading states. Instead of manually managing loading flags and states, you can wrap your components in Suspense boundaries:

// app/page.tsx
import { Suspense } from 'react';
import { SlowComponent } from './SlowComponent';

export default function Page() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h1>Fast Content</h1>
      <Suspense fallback={<p>Loading slow content...</p>}>
        <SlowComponent />
      </Suspense>
    </div>
  );
}
Using "use client"

The "use client" approach often requires more boilerplate code but provides explicit control over client-side behavior:

// components/InteractiveWidget.tsx
'use client';

import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';

export function InteractiveWidget() {
  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true);
  const [error, setError] = useState(null);
  const [data, setData] = useState(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    fetchData()
      .then(result => {
        setData(result);
        setIsLoading(false);
      })
      .catch(err => {
        setError(err);
        setIsLoading(false);
      });
  }, []);

  if (error) return <ErrorDisplay error={error} />;
  if (isLoading) return <LoadingSpinner />;
  return <div>{/* Render data */}</div>;
}

Best Practices and Recommendations

When to Use Suspense

  1. For managing loading states across multiple components

  2. When you want to progressively load page content

  3. For handling async operations in a more declarative way

  4. When working with server components that fetch data

When to Use "use client"

  1. For components that need browser APIs

  2. When implementing interactive features

  3. For components that use React hooks

  4. When you need to handle client-side events

Combining Both Approaches

You can effectively use both features together. Here's a pattern that leverages the strengths of both:

// app/page.tsx
import { Suspense } from 'react';
import { InteractiveWidget } from './InteractiveWidget';

export default function Page() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h1>My App</h1>
      <Suspense fallback={<LoadingUI />}>
        <InteractiveWidget /> {/* Has 'use client' */}
      </Suspense>
    </div>
  );
}

Performance Optimization Tips

  1. Minimize "use client" Usage

    • Only add the directive where absolutely necessary

    • Keep client-side components small and focused

    • Consider splitting large client components into smaller ones

  2. Strategic Suspense Boundaries

    • Place Suspense boundaries at logical UI breakpoints

    • Use nested Suspense for more granular loading states

    • Consider the user experience when choosing fallback UI

  3. Bundle Size Management

    • Monitor your bundle size when adding "use client" components

    • Use dynamic imports for large client-side features

    • Consider code splitting for better performance

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between Suspense and "use client" is crucial for building efficient Next.js applications. While Suspense offers a more elegant way to handle loading states and async operations, "use client" is essential for client-side interactivity. The key is knowing when to use each feature and how to combine them effectively.

Remember that these choices can significantly impact your application's performance, especially regarding bundle size and initial load times. Always consider the trade-offs and choose the approach that best suits your specific use case.

For more insights and discussions about these features, check out the Next.js community discussions where developers share their experiences and best practices.

Raymond Yeh

Raymond Yeh

Published on 05 November 2024

Get engineers' time back from marketing!

Don't let managing a blog on your site get in the way of your core product.

Wisp empowers your marketing team to create and manage content on your website without consuming more engineering hours.

Get started in few lines of codes.

Choosing a CMS
Related Posts
Mastering React Suspense in Next.js 15: A Developer's Guide

Mastering React Suspense in Next.js 15: A Developer's Guide

Discover how React Suspense in Next.js 15 brings elegance by simplifying loading states, reducing boilerplate, and enhancing the performance of your applications.

Read Full Story
SSG vs SSR in Next.js: Making the Right Choice for Your Application

SSG vs SSR in Next.js: Making the Right Choice for Your Application

Optimize your Next.js application with the right rendering strategy. Learn when to choose SSG, SSR, or ISR based on your content needs and performance goals.

Read Full Story
Should I Just Use Next.js for Fullstack Development?

Should I Just Use Next.js for Fullstack Development?

Is Next.js the right fit for your fullstack project? Dive into its key features, challenges, and real developer experiences to make an informed choice.

Read Full Story