HubSpot CMS vs Framer CMS

HubSpot's free plan allows you to build a website without paying, although there are some limitations.

HubSpot provides a robust set of marketing tools, including SEO and blogging features, making it attractive for inbound marketing.

HubSpot's Smart Content feature allows personalization based on visitor data, creating tailored user experiences.

The drag-and-drop interface is user-friendly for non-developers, allowing easy updates and page creation.

Strong security features including SSL and automatic backups bolster user confidence in the platform.

Offers a wide selection of marketing features integrated into the CRM, enhancing lead generation.

Framer combines UX design capabilities with staging and publishing features, making it an excellent web design tool.

Framer is particularly well-suited for small teams and freelancers focused on design-centric projects.

Offers a simple, intuitive design interface that’s similar to tools like Figma, making it easy for designers to adopt.

Users appreciate the design flexibility and user-friendliness for creating visually appealing websites.

The community aspect of Framer is growing, providing ample resources for users to learn and collaborate.

Framer’s CMS allows for a variety of dynamic content management capabilities.

The learning curve can be steep for users unfamiliar with HubSpot's unique interface and setup process.

The user interface can be overwhelming and inflexible, making it harder for new users to navigate.

Significant price jumps between plans can be a drawback for small businesses with limited budgets.

Backup and recovery options are limited compared to some other CMS platforms.

Lacks native eCommerce features, which can be a limitation for businesses focused on selling products.

The CMS has a rigid editor which can hinder precise customization attempts.

Users find the pricing structure to be restrictive, especially with limited CMS collections for lower tiers.

Framer lacks relational database capabilities, making complex content structures difficult to manage.

Framer lacks advanced features found in competitors like Webflow, which has a significantly higher CMS item limit.

The lack of re-usable components can lead to redundancy and inefficiency in design.

Users report issues with slow updates and functionality, leading to frustrations with the platform.

Framer's basic analytics and SEO features are less comprehensive compared to competitors, limiting performance tracking abilities.

The platform is prone to technical issues that can disrupt project progress, causing dissatisfaction among users.

Expectations for e-commerce solutions are unmet, as Framer does not currently support this functionality.

Requires a paid add-on for features like bot detection and caching, increasing costs unexpectedly.

Flexible layout options allow for custom module creation in the drag-and-drop editor.

The CRM integration with the CMS provides a holistic view of customer interactions.

The block-based editor is straightforward for marketers to utilize.

Allows for easy dynamic content generation through custom coding.

Users feel that the platform is overall good for businesses looking for integrated solutions.

The new-and-improved editor experience is expected to enhance usability.

Users appreciate the ease of creating and managing collections and items in the CMS.

Framer’s interface is noted as snappy and makes web design enjoyable.

Framer allows easy scalability of designs through its CMS, making it suitable for repetitive content.

The user interface is regarded as superior for interacting with items in the CMS compared to competitors.

Users find it easy to link and create detailed pages from collections.

Importing data into the CMS is user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience.

Lack of flexibility in creating layouts without developer input.

Cumbersome and lag-prone landing page creation tools.

Challenges in finding capable HubSpot developers.

Users report difficulties in managing content without coding skills.

Editing in the HubSpot CMS can be complex for non-technical users.

Standard blog features may be limited unless extensive customization is applied.

Limited number of CMS collections based on the pricing tier frustrates users.

Some features lack beginner-friendly guidance, causing confusion among new users.

There are limitations in terms of advanced features like dynamic filtering of items.

Framer’s CMS still lacks the robustness and advanced field types found in other platforms like Webflow.

Users indicate a need for better support and documentation to help navigate complex features.

Some users reported sluggishness in complex edits, despite the overall snappiness.

Easy setup for those familiar with marketing tools.

Integration with CRM adds value to marketing efforts.

Customizable by developers; can be tailored to specific needs.

HubSpot integrates well with other marketing tools, creating a seamless workflow.

Framer allows easy sorting of CMS items by various fields like text strings, dates, etc.

CMS allows for dynamic content management with customizable fields to enhance user experience.

The CMS supports filtering collections easily, enhancing content presentation.

Users can import data from CSV files, making it easy to bring content into Framer.

Dynamic references in CMS allow linking of content across collections, making management easier.

Building a CMS page is straightforward, especially for those familiar with design tools like Figma.

Lacks flexibility without custom development.

Building complex integrations can be a challenge.

API integration issues reported by users.

Duplication of records can complicate integration processes.

Recent updates broke some superfields components, leading to issues in large collections.

Users reported difficulties with updating components after new Framer updates.

Support response times are slow, making troubleshooting issues frustrating for users.

Framer lacks advanced features compared to other CMS solutions, limiting user capabilities.

Integration with third-party tools is limited, affecting the user experience.

Users expressed concerns over the stability of CMS features post-update.