Framer CMS vs Ghost

Framer combines UX design capabilities with staging and publishing features, making it an excellent web design tool.

Framer is particularly well-suited for small teams and freelancers focused on design-centric projects.

Offers a simple, intuitive design interface that’s similar to tools like Figma, making it easy for designers to adopt.

Users appreciate the design flexibility and user-friendliness for creating visually appealing websites.

The community aspect of Framer is growing, providing ample resources for users to learn and collaborate.

Framer’s CMS allows for a variety of dynamic content management capabilities.

Ghost CMS offers a fast and modern writing experience with built-in newsletters, great SEO tools, and strong security features.

Ghost Pro provides a robust user experience compared to self-hosting, offering faster speeds and ease of use without technical maintenance.

Ghost emphasizes a clean editing experience, allowing seamless integration of multimedia and effective SEO practices without the clutter often found in other CMSs.

Ghost CMS users appreciate its focus on content creation and the simplicity of publishing without the overhead of plugins or extensive settings.

Users find the pricing structure to be restrictive, especially with limited CMS collections for lower tiers.

Framer lacks relational database capabilities, making complex content structures difficult to manage.

Framer lacks advanced features found in competitors like Webflow, which has a significantly higher CMS item limit.

The lack of re-usable components can lead to redundancy and inefficiency in design.

Users report issues with slow updates and functionality, leading to frustrations with the platform.

Framer's basic analytics and SEO features are less comprehensive compared to competitors, limiting performance tracking abilities.

The platform is prone to technical issues that can disrupt project progress, causing dissatisfaction among users.

Expectations for e-commerce solutions are unmet, as Framer does not currently support this functionality.

Requires a paid add-on for features like bot detection and caching, increasing costs unexpectedly.

Customization in Ghost is limited; most advanced changes require coding knowledge, making it less accessible for non-technical users.

Self-hosting Ghost can lead to technical challenges that might overwhelm users without coding skills, affecting performance and uptime.

Ghost lacks built-in features that are common in other CMSs, such as advanced search options and email marketing tools, often requiring third-party integrations.

Users often express difficulty with theme customization and the necessity of understanding coding to make even minor adjustments, leading to frustration.

Users appreciate the ease of creating and managing collections and items in the CMS.

Framer’s interface is noted as snappy and makes web design enjoyable.

Framer allows easy scalability of designs through its CMS, making it suitable for repetitive content.

The user interface is regarded as superior for interacting with items in the CMS compared to competitors.

Users find it easy to link and create detailed pages from collections.

Importing data into the CMS is user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience.

Fast blogs with built-in SEO optimization.

Focuses on the writing process with clean UI and markdown support.

Great built-in features for SEO without the need for plugins.

Community feedback highlights simplifying the publishing process.

Limited number of CMS collections based on the pricing tier frustrates users.

Some features lack beginner-friendly guidance, causing confusion among new users.

There are limitations in terms of advanced features like dynamic filtering of items.

Framer’s CMS still lacks the robustness and advanced field types found in other platforms like Webflow.

Users indicate a need for better support and documentation to help navigate complex features.

Some users reported sluggishness in complex edits, despite the overall snappiness.

Complicated setup and self-hosting challenges.

Limited built-in features, requiring more coding knowledge for customization.

Need for coding knowledge for theme customization.

Lacks drag and drop capabilities for complex layouts.

Framer allows easy sorting of CMS items by various fields like text strings, dates, etc.

CMS allows for dynamic content management with customizable fields to enhance user experience.

The CMS supports filtering collections easily, enhancing content presentation.

Users can import data from CSV files, making it easy to bring content into Framer.

Dynamic references in CMS allow linking of content across collections, making management easier.

Building a CMS page is straightforward, especially for those familiar with design tools like Figma.

Ghost provides a fast loading time and built-in newsletter without requiring multiple plugins.

Great built-in SEO tools that work well without needing external plugins.

User-friendly editor that focuses on content without distraction, supports markdown and easy embedding.

Users find Ghost faster than WordPress and simpler in terms of setup for content creation.

Ghost handles many essential functions inherently, decreasing the need for plugins.

Ghost has built-in membership features, simplifying monetization without additional installation.

Recent updates broke some superfields components, leading to issues in large collections.

Users reported difficulties with updating components after new Framer updates.

Support response times are slow, making troubleshooting issues frustrating for users.

Framer lacks advanced features compared to other CMS solutions, limiting user capabilities.

Integration with third-party tools is limited, affecting the user experience.

Users expressed concerns over the stability of CMS features post-update.

Self-hosting Ghost can get tricky, particularly when integrating with services like Mailgun.

Customization of Ghost themes requires manual coding knowledge, making it difficult for those unfamiliar with code.

Lacks built-in features for typical blogging needs, requiring third-party integrations for some functionalities.

Difficulties managing affiliate links due to limited functionalities for bulk changes in Ghost.

Limited SEO functionalities compared to WordPress, causing challenges in internal linking.

Lack of media library forces users to manage images through SSH, which can be inconvenient.