Framer CMS vs WordPress.com

Framer combines UX design capabilities with staging and publishing features, making it an excellent web design tool.

Framer is particularly well-suited for small teams and freelancers focused on design-centric projects.

Offers a simple, intuitive design interface that’s similar to tools like Figma, making it easy for designers to adopt.

Users appreciate the design flexibility and user-friendliness for creating visually appealing websites.

The community aspect of Framer is growing, providing ample resources for users to learn and collaborate.

Framer’s CMS allows for a variety of dynamic content management capabilities.

Good customer experience with live video tech support; helpful for users needing hands-on assistance.

Some users report that the platform offers great flexibility and features with premium plans.

The platform is considered easy to set up, attracting many users looking for a straightforward blogging experience.

Offers users built-in functionality like payment buttons in basic plans, which can be appealing for beginners.

Many users appreciate the support and documentation available, indicating a well-maintained community.

Some users find WordPress.com to be suitable, especially for those not wanting to deal with technical aspects.

Users find the pricing structure to be restrictive, especially with limited CMS collections for lower tiers.

Framer lacks relational database capabilities, making complex content structures difficult to manage.

Framer lacks advanced features found in competitors like Webflow, which has a significantly higher CMS item limit.

The lack of re-usable components can lead to redundancy and inefficiency in design.

Users report issues with slow updates and functionality, leading to frustrations with the platform.

Framer's basic analytics and SEO features are less comprehensive compared to competitors, limiting performance tracking abilities.

The platform is prone to technical issues that can disrupt project progress, causing dissatisfaction among users.

Expectations for e-commerce solutions are unmet, as Framer does not currently support this functionality.

Requires a paid add-on for features like bot detection and caching, increasing costs unexpectedly.

A significant number of users report frustration with customer service, especially concerning lack of support for free plans.

Many reviews highlight issues with pricing, calling it outrageous for the limitations it imposes on users.

Several users find the platform slow and riddled with vulnerabilities due to excessive reliance on plugins.

Users often complain about the complexities introduced by the new editor interface that disrupts their workflow.

The Gutenberg editor has received mixed reviews, with some users labeling it counterintuitive and difficult for beginners.

Some users express that the support for WordPress.com is lacking, particularly for those who don't invest in premium plans.

Users appreciate the ease of creating and managing collections and items in the CMS.

Framer’s interface is noted as snappy and makes web design enjoyable.

Framer allows easy scalability of designs through its CMS, making it suitable for repetitive content.

The user interface is regarded as superior for interacting with items in the CMS compared to competitors.

Users find it easy to link and create detailed pages from collections.

Importing data into the CMS is user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience.

Users appreciate the flexibility and ease of use compared to traditional editors.

Divi is powerful and flexible with a user-friendly interface, appealing for developers.

Initial impressions indicate great layout flexibility and clean distraction-free writing.

Limited number of CMS collections based on the pricing tier frustrates users.

Some features lack beginner-friendly guidance, causing confusion among new users.

There are limitations in terms of advanced features like dynamic filtering of items.

Framer’s CMS still lacks the robustness and advanced field types found in other platforms like Webflow.

Users indicate a need for better support and documentation to help navigate complex features.

Some users reported sluggishness in complex edits, despite the overall snappiness.

Users face sluggish performance with longer articles in Gutenberg.

Disorganized interface and complex user experience hinder usability.

The editor's reliance on shortcodes complicates migration away from Divi.

Initial blocks organization and toolbar access in Gutenberg is not intuitive.

Framer allows easy sorting of CMS items by various fields like text strings, dates, etc.

CMS allows for dynamic content management with customizable fields to enhance user experience.

The CMS supports filtering collections easily, enhancing content presentation.

Users can import data from CSV files, making it easy to bring content into Framer.

Dynamic references in CMS allow linking of content across collections, making management easier.

Building a CMS page is straightforward, especially for those familiar with design tools like Figma.

The Site Reviews plugin offers excellent support and extensive features for managing reviews.

Recent updates broke some superfields components, leading to issues in large collections.

Users reported difficulties with updating components after new Framer updates.

Support response times are slow, making troubleshooting issues frustrating for users.

Framer lacks advanced features compared to other CMS solutions, limiting user capabilities.

Integration with third-party tools is limited, affecting the user experience.

Users expressed concerns over the stability of CMS features post-update.

Some users reported a steep learning curve with custom settings, causing frustrations during setup.

Difficulty with finding the correct Place ID for showing related Google reviews for their business.

Some users faced issues with caching interfering with nonce verification for security.