Beehiiv vs Framer CMS

Beehiiv allows users to monetize newsletters effectively even at low subscriber counts.

Beehiiv's recommendation feature provides a way to cross-promote other newsletters.

Beehiiv's Partner Program helps creators earn additional income easily.

Beehiiv provides excellent analytics for tracking performance and user acquisition metrics.

Beehiiv offers a clear, modern newsletter builder that is user-friendly.

Beehiiv’s Boosts feature allows monetization through newsletter promotions.

Framer combines UX design capabilities with staging and publishing features, making it an excellent web design tool.

Framer is particularly well-suited for small teams and freelancers focused on design-centric projects.

Offers a simple, intuitive design interface that’s similar to tools like Figma, making it easy for designers to adopt.

Users appreciate the design flexibility and user-friendliness for creating visually appealing websites.

The community aspect of Framer is growing, providing ample resources for users to learn and collaborate.

Framer’s CMS allows for a variety of dynamic content management capabilities.

Beehiiv lacks customization options for forms and templates.

Beehiiv needs more flexible segmentation options for subscribers.

There are limitations in the ability to send newsletters based on subscriber time zones.

The platform lacks in-built SEO features compared to competitors.

Complexity of features can overwhelm new users.

Integration options with other services are limited, which can restrict functionality.

Users find the pricing structure to be restrictive, especially with limited CMS collections for lower tiers.

Framer lacks relational database capabilities, making complex content structures difficult to manage.

Framer lacks advanced features found in competitors like Webflow, which has a significantly higher CMS item limit.

The lack of re-usable components can lead to redundancy and inefficiency in design.

Users report issues with slow updates and functionality, leading to frustrations with the platform.

Framer's basic analytics and SEO features are less comprehensive compared to competitors, limiting performance tracking abilities.

The platform is prone to technical issues that can disrupt project progress, causing dissatisfaction among users.

Expectations for e-commerce solutions are unmet, as Framer does not currently support this functionality.

Requires a paid add-on for features like bot detection and caching, increasing costs unexpectedly.

The 'Start Writing' button is prominently displayed for easy content creation.

Beehiiv’s interface is clean and user-friendly, promoting easy writing and design.

Great flexibility in email design with a user-friendly interface.

Multiple newsletters can be managed from one account, allowing for tailored content.

Custom domain support is available, enhancing branding opportunities.

Provides strong SEO features, benefiting content creators.

Users appreciate the ease of creating and managing collections and items in the CMS.

Framer’s interface is noted as snappy and makes web design enjoyable.

Framer allows easy scalability of designs through its CMS, making it suitable for repetitive content.

The user interface is regarded as superior for interacting with items in the CMS compared to competitors.

Users find it easy to link and create detailed pages from collections.

Importing data into the CMS is user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience.

The default settings can be confusing for those focused solely on email rather than blogging.

Limited customization options in the website design.

Customization options are limited, particularly for websites.

Users want more granularity in subscriber tracking features.

Advanced features are often locked behind paid plans, limiting access for some users.

Email automation requires an upgrade to a paid plan, limiting early users.

Limited number of CMS collections based on the pricing tier frustrates users.

Some features lack beginner-friendly guidance, causing confusion among new users.

There are limitations in terms of advanced features like dynamic filtering of items.

Framer’s CMS still lacks the robustness and advanced field types found in other platforms like Webflow.

Users indicate a need for better support and documentation to help navigate complex features.

Some users reported sluggishness in complex edits, despite the overall snappiness.

Users appreciate the ease of using plugins for integration with WordPress.

Framer allows easy sorting of CMS items by various fields like text strings, dates, etc.

CMS allows for dynamic content management with customizable fields to enhance user experience.

The CMS supports filtering collections easily, enhancing content presentation.

Users can import data from CSV files, making it easy to bring content into Framer.

Dynamic references in CMS allow linking of content across collections, making management easier.

Building a CMS page is straightforward, especially for those familiar with design tools like Figma.

Limited customization options for signup forms reported by users.

Lack of advanced functionality in the API noted by users who need more options.

Recent updates broke some superfields components, leading to issues in large collections.

Users reported difficulties with updating components after new Framer updates.

Support response times are slow, making troubleshooting issues frustrating for users.

Framer lacks advanced features compared to other CMS solutions, limiting user capabilities.

Integration with third-party tools is limited, affecting the user experience.

Users expressed concerns over the stability of CMS features post-update.