Framer CMS vs Storyblok

Framer combines UX design capabilities with staging and publishing features, making it an excellent web design tool.

Framer is particularly well-suited for small teams and freelancers focused on design-centric projects.

Offers a simple, intuitive design interface that’s similar to tools like Figma, making it easy for designers to adopt.

Users appreciate the design flexibility and user-friendliness for creating visually appealing websites.

The community aspect of Framer is growing, providing ample resources for users to learn and collaborate.

Framer’s CMS allows for a variety of dynamic content management capabilities.

Flexible component-based architecture for content management.

Real-time visual editing improves content management efficiency.

Offers multilingual support with unlimited locales.

Users note that Storyblok is easier to set up and manage compared to other CMS options.

High user satisfaction noted for collaboration tools and community support.

Strong integration capabilities with modern web frameworks.

Users find the pricing structure to be restrictive, especially with limited CMS collections for lower tiers.

Framer lacks relational database capabilities, making complex content structures difficult to manage.

Framer lacks advanced features found in competitors like Webflow, which has a significantly higher CMS item limit.

The lack of re-usable components can lead to redundancy and inefficiency in design.

Users report issues with slow updates and functionality, leading to frustrations with the platform.

Framer's basic analytics and SEO features are less comprehensive compared to competitors, limiting performance tracking abilities.

The platform is prone to technical issues that can disrupt project progress, causing dissatisfaction among users.

Expectations for e-commerce solutions are unmet, as Framer does not currently support this functionality.

Requires a paid add-on for features like bot detection and caching, increasing costs unexpectedly.

Integration issues reported with advanced configurations for specific frameworks.

Complexity in usage mentioned, especially for content editors.

Higher pricing tiers may be a barrier for smaller projects.

Documentation issues raised, particularly for enterprise users needing direct support.

Reported challenges with learning curves for new users.

Limited customization options for non-blog features.

Users appreciate the ease of creating and managing collections and items in the CMS.

Framer’s interface is noted as snappy and makes web design enjoyable.

Framer allows easy scalability of designs through its CMS, making it suitable for repetitive content.

The user interface is regarded as superior for interacting with items in the CMS compared to competitors.

Users find it easy to link and create detailed pages from collections.

Importing data into the CMS is user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience.

The visual editor enables real-time content updates and easy revisions by multiple team members.

Flexible content modeling allows teams to create custom structures and components easily.

The platform supports multichannel publishing with a strong emphasis on flexibility.

Excellent localization capabilities contribute to effective global content management.

Quickly set up and manage content with component-based structure, reducing content creation time.

User-friendly interface, ideal for non-technical users and marketers.

Limited number of CMS collections based on the pricing tier frustrates users.

Some features lack beginner-friendly guidance, causing confusion among new users.

There are limitations in terms of advanced features like dynamic filtering of items.

Framer’s CMS still lacks the robustness and advanced field types found in other platforms like Webflow.

Users indicate a need for better support and documentation to help navigate complex features.

Some users reported sluggishness in complex edits, despite the overall snappiness.

Some users report issues with slow load times and editor bugs that hinder content updates.

High costs for smaller companies can be a significant barrier, affecting decisions to adopt.

Initial setup can be complex, requiring more developer involvement than anticipated.

The learning curve for new users can be steep, making it challenging for clients without technical backgrounds.

Limited content modeling options in some scenarios restrict advanced customization needs.

Users have faced issues with the editor reverting content after saving changes.

Framer allows easy sorting of CMS items by various fields like text strings, dates, etc.

CMS allows for dynamic content management with customizable fields to enhance user experience.

The CMS supports filtering collections easily, enhancing content presentation.

Users can import data from CSV files, making it easy to bring content into Framer.

Dynamic references in CMS allow linking of content across collections, making management easier.

Building a CMS page is straightforward, especially for those familiar with design tools like Figma.

The API is relatively easy to use with starter packs for JS frameworks, plus a neat CDN for images.

Storyblok's UI is friendly for non-tech-savvy clients, enhancing user experience when used correctly.

Storyblok offers flexibility with a headless approach enabling the use of different technology stacks.

Users appreciate the flexibility of the content management with rich media capabilities and a user-friendly visual editor.

Recent updates broke some superfields components, leading to issues in large collections.

Users reported difficulties with updating components after new Framer updates.

Support response times are slow, making troubleshooting issues frustrating for users.

Framer lacks advanced features compared to other CMS solutions, limiting user capabilities.

Integration with third-party tools is limited, affecting the user experience.

Users expressed concerns over the stability of CMS features post-update.

Users report poor customer support and long response times, impacting their ability to resolve issues quickly.

Some users experienced bugs with the CMS, leading to major frustrations and project delays.

Users find the documentation outdated and poorly managed, making it difficult to utilize the platform effectively.

Some developers feel that learning the system can be frustrating due to its reliance on older technologies like Vue 2.