Framer CMS vs Agility

Framer combines UX design capabilities with staging and publishing features, making it an excellent web design tool.

Framer is particularly well-suited for small teams and freelancers focused on design-centric projects.

Offers a simple, intuitive design interface that’s similar to tools like Figma, making it easy for designers to adopt.

Users appreciate the design flexibility and user-friendliness for creating visually appealing websites.

The community aspect of Framer is growing, providing ample resources for users to learn and collaborate.

Framer’s CMS allows for a variety of dynamic content management capabilities.

Agility CMS provides excellent flexibility and scalability.

The system features intuitive editing and allows for significant customization.

Users appreciate its capability to manage content across multiple languages and platforms.

Offers robust marketing features allowing users without coding skills to manage content efficiently.

The platform provides a cloud-native architecture for scalability and performance.

Customer support ratings are high, emphasizing the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team.

Users find the pricing structure to be restrictive, especially with limited CMS collections for lower tiers.

Framer lacks relational database capabilities, making complex content structures difficult to manage.

Framer lacks advanced features found in competitors like Webflow, which has a significantly higher CMS item limit.

The lack of re-usable components can lead to redundancy and inefficiency in design.

Users report issues with slow updates and functionality, leading to frustrations with the platform.

Framer's basic analytics and SEO features are less comprehensive compared to competitors, limiting performance tracking abilities.

The platform is prone to technical issues that can disrupt project progress, causing dissatisfaction among users.

Expectations for e-commerce solutions are unmet, as Framer does not currently support this functionality.

Requires a paid add-on for features like bot detection and caching, increasing costs unexpectedly.

Some users reported bugs within the application that hinder usability.

Users have mentioned that the initial learning curve can be steep for new users.

Issues with customer support and reliance on third-party developers for problem resolution.

Integration with other software can be complex and requires developers.

Some users experience slow content publication times due to system performance.

Complexities in customization can lead to difficulties without technical assistance.

Users appreciate the ease of creating and managing collections and items in the CMS.

Framer’s interface is noted as snappy and makes web design enjoyable.

Framer allows easy scalability of designs through its CMS, making it suitable for repetitive content.

The user interface is regarded as superior for interacting with items in the CMS compared to competitors.

Users find it easy to link and create detailed pages from collections.

Importing data into the CMS is user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience.

The new Web Studio enhances user experience with intuitive navigation and streamlined collaboration features.

Content modeling allows users to define and relate content flexibly, enhancing the overall editing experience.

Users appreciate the collaboration tools and content modeling capabilities as key features of Agility CMS.

Highlighted successful implementations show how companies improved content management using Agility CMS.

High ratings for ease of use and integration support, enhancing the editorial experience for content creators.

Users find the platform easy to use for creating and updating digital content, backed by excellent support.

Limited number of CMS collections based on the pricing tier frustrates users.

Some features lack beginner-friendly guidance, causing confusion among new users.

There are limitations in terms of advanced features like dynamic filtering of items.

Framer’s CMS still lacks the robustness and advanced field types found in other platforms like Webflow.

Users indicate a need for better support and documentation to help navigate complex features.

Some users reported sluggishness in complex edits, despite the overall snappiness.

Users report occasional bugs in the application that hinder seamless editing.

Customization can sometimes be challenging, leading to dissatisfaction among some users.

Specific integration features require improvement, which can impact the overall experience.

Some users expressed frustration with complex workflows that can complicate simple tasks.

Limited features for advanced content management tasks are mentioned by some reviewers.

Framer allows easy sorting of CMS items by various fields like text strings, dates, etc.

CMS allows for dynamic content management with customizable fields to enhance user experience.

The CMS supports filtering collections easily, enhancing content presentation.

Users can import data from CSV files, making it easy to bring content into Framer.

Dynamic references in CMS allow linking of content across collections, making management easier.

Building a CMS page is straightforward, especially for those familiar with design tools like Figma.

Agility CMS offers flexible integration capabilities.

Recent collaboration with Netlify enhances integration functionality.

Users appreciate the user-friendly interface of Agility CMS for integration.

Integrates smoothly with Next.js, enhancing development experience.

Agility CMS users find it easy to work with the platform for content management tasks.

Good for non-developers to manage content with some technical support.

Recent updates broke some superfields components, leading to issues in large collections.

Users reported difficulties with updating components after new Framer updates.

Support response times are slow, making troubleshooting issues frustrating for users.

Framer lacks advanced features compared to other CMS solutions, limiting user capabilities.

Integration with third-party tools is limited, affecting the user experience.

Users expressed concerns over the stability of CMS features post-update.

Some users report bugs in the app that impede smoother integration.

Integration is reported to be costly, leading some users to hesitate.

Users mention difficulties with certain customization aspects of the integration.

Complexity in handling integrations can be a challenge for beginners.

Users face challenges during integration for more extensive projects.

Some users feel that documentation for integrating with Agility CMS can be lacking.