TYPO3 vs Storyblok

TYPO3 is described as a powerful and flexible open-source enterprise CMS.

Some users find TYPO3 has a lot of powerful features for enterprise-level applications.

Some users mention that TYPO3 attempts to follow modern coding standards like PSR.

Experienced web developers may find TYPO3's multifaceted approach beneficial for complex projects.

Some community members appreciate the unique features and extensive functionalities of TYPO3 for large-scale implementations.

Flexible component-based architecture for content management.

Real-time visual editing improves content management efficiency.

Offers multilingual support with unlimited locales.

Users note that Storyblok is easier to set up and manage compared to other CMS options.

High user satisfaction noted for collaboration tools and community support.

Strong integration capabilities with modern web frameworks.

Many users think TYPO3 is very complicated and non-intuitive for new users.

The documentation and user experience of TYPO3 are described as frustrating and hard to navigate.

Users criticize TYPO3's template system as overly complex and outdated.

The extension builder in TYPO3 is commonly viewed as being outdated and frustrating to use.

Some developers feel that TYPO3's reliance on TypoScript is an unnecessary hurdle.

Integration issues reported with advanced configurations for specific frameworks.

Complexity in usage mentioned, especially for content editors.

Higher pricing tiers may be a barrier for smaller projects.

Documentation issues raised, particularly for enterprise users needing direct support.

Reported challenges with learning curves for new users.

Limited customization options for non-blog features.

Intuitive onboarding process for new users; easy to manage content with minimal training.

Good media management capabilities for images and files; easy reuse across content.

Support for multilingual setups out-of-the-box, facilitating easy content translation.

Flexible page assembly through modular elements allows for design control by editors.

Clear organizational structure with a hierarchical page system that feels intuitive.

Improved ease of use with recent updates; many features now available without extensive configuration.

The visual editor enables real-time content updates and easy revisions by multiple team members.

Flexible content modeling allows teams to create custom structures and components easily.

The platform supports multichannel publishing with a strong emphasis on flexibility.

Excellent localization capabilities contribute to effective global content management.

Quickly set up and manage content with component-based structure, reducing content creation time.

User-friendly interface, ideal for non-technical users and marketers.

Steep learning curve due to configurations requiring extensive knowledge of TypoScript.

Complexity increases with the need for multi-tasking; users struggle with navigating many configurations at once.

Documentation can be outdated and hard to follow, making the learning process more challenging.

Configuration can feel convoluted due to reliance on multiple files and settings across the system.

Some users find TYPO3's internal structure complex, making it difficult for beginners to navigate.

The need for continuous updates and maintenance can be a major drawback for some users.

Some users report issues with slow load times and editor bugs that hinder content updates.

High costs for smaller companies can be a significant barrier, affecting decisions to adopt.

Initial setup can be complex, requiring more developer involvement than anticipated.

The learning curve for new users can be steep, making it challenging for clients without technical backgrounds.

Limited content modeling options in some scenarios restrict advanced customization needs.

Users have faced issues with the editor reverting content after saving changes.

Flexible plugin configurations enhance user experience while integrating.

Seamless integration with tools for content quality and compliance checks directly within TYPO3.

Users find TYPO3’s template engine Fluid easy to integrate with various designs.

Community-driven extensions like 'paste_reference' provide enhanced functionalities with proper integration support.

Development and customization options available for TYPO3 allow for bespoke solutions.

The plugin supports real-time error fixes, enhancing site management efficiency.

The API is relatively easy to use with starter packs for JS frameworks, plus a neat CDN for images.

Storyblok's UI is friendly for non-tech-savvy clients, enhancing user experience when used correctly.

Storyblok offers flexibility with a headless approach enabling the use of different technology stacks.

Users appreciate the flexibility of the content management with rich media capabilities and a user-friendly visual editor.

The extensive feature set can be overwhelming for newcomers.

Integrating certain plugins can lead to complexity and potential conflicts.

Some users struggle with the learning curve associated with TYPO3’s capabilities.

Requires constant updates for optimal performance and security on newer TYPO3 versions.

Limited backward compatibility with older TYPO3 versions may create integration issues.

Users report poor customer support and long response times, impacting their ability to resolve issues quickly.

Some users experienced bugs with the CMS, leading to major frustrations and project delays.

Users find the documentation outdated and poorly managed, making it difficult to utilize the platform effectively.

Some developers feel that learning the system can be frustrating due to its reliance on older technologies like Vue 2.