Storyblok vs Webflow CMS

Flexible component-based architecture for content management.

Real-time visual editing improves content management efficiency.

Offers multilingual support with unlimited locales.

Users note that Storyblok is easier to set up and manage compared to other CMS options.

High user satisfaction noted for collaboration tools and community support.

Strong integration capabilities with modern web frameworks.

Highly customizable templates available for a unique design.

One of the best tools for creating animations and interactions.

Solid customer support materials available.

Autosave and backup features are robust.

SEO-friendly features are provided out of the box.

Webflow reduces maintenance headaches for developers.

Ease of use for clients is highlighted by many developers.

Integration issues reported with advanced configurations for specific frameworks.

Complexity in usage mentioned, especially for content editors.

Higher pricing tiers may be a barrier for smaller projects.

Documentation issues raised, particularly for enterprise users needing direct support.

Reported challenges with learning curves for new users.

Limited customization options for non-blog features.

Cost can be a barrier for small businesses.

The pricing structure is seen as confusing and convoluted.

Limited blogging features for high-output bloggers.

Ecommerce limits can be restrictive in terms of scalability.

Ecommerce features are less developed compared to dedicated ecommerce platforms.

Lack of built-in cookie consent mechanism.

The visual editor enables real-time content updates and easy revisions by multiple team members.

Flexible content modeling allows teams to create custom structures and components easily.

The platform supports multichannel publishing with a strong emphasis on flexibility.

Excellent localization capabilities contribute to effective global content management.

Quickly set up and manage content with component-based structure, reducing content creation time.

User-friendly interface, ideal for non-technical users and marketers.

Users appreciate the overall design and ease of navigating the CMS interface.

The legacy editor simplifies content management for non-technical users.

Users enjoy the visual editing experience, comparing it favorably against other platforms.

Some users report issues with slow load times and editor bugs that hinder content updates.

High costs for smaller companies can be a significant barrier, affecting decisions to adopt.

Initial setup can be complex, requiring more developer involvement than anticipated.

The learning curve for new users can be steep, making it challenging for clients without technical backgrounds.

Limited content modeling options in some scenarios restrict advanced customization needs.

Users have faced issues with the editor reverting content after saving changes.

Localization features break the CMS editor, preventing text edits for secondary locales.

Users report severe formatting issues when copying and pasting text in the editor.

Rich text editing has numerous glitches, making it difficult for users to maintain text formatting.

Editors publish changes that can cause issues on the live site, without staging capabilities.

The API is relatively easy to use with starter packs for JS frameworks, plus a neat CDN for images.

Storyblok's UI is friendly for non-tech-savvy clients, enhancing user experience when used correctly.

Storyblok offers flexibility with a headless approach enabling the use of different technology stacks.

Users appreciate the flexibility of the content management with rich media capabilities and a user-friendly visual editor.

Webflow offers quick publishing with no server complexities, enabling faster updates.

Webflow provides a clean, no-code interface with robust integrations for web tools and services.

Webflow makes it easy to create highly customized and responsive sites without extensive coding.

Webflow's CMS makes it easy to publish content and manage simple websites effectively.

Webflow allows for the design and editing of responsive sites with real-time visibility.

Robust SEO tools are built-in, allowing for easy optimization of web pages.

Users report poor customer support and long response times, impacting their ability to resolve issues quickly.

Some users experienced bugs with the CMS, leading to major frustrations and project delays.

Users find the documentation outdated and poorly managed, making it difficult to utilize the platform effectively.

Some developers feel that learning the system can be frustrating due to its reliance on older technologies like Vue 2.

Webflow's learning curve can be steep for complete beginners, requiring some coding understanding.

The extensive pricing structure can confuse users and impact the decision to integrate effectively.

Certain limitations on product counts in eCommerce plans can restrict business growth.

Customization often requires code in scenarios where a user-friendly interface would suffice.

You only have access to email support which can be slow to respond in critical situations.

Webflow does not offer built-in cookie consent tools, making compliance difficult.