Strapi vs Framer CMS

Highly customizable with a variety of plugins and a strong API.

Strapi is open-source and has a strong developer community.

Good for SEO with features to enhance visibility.

Flexibility in terms of integrating various databases.

Developer-friendly with extensive documentation and community support.

Framer combines UX design capabilities with staging and publishing features, making it an excellent web design tool.

Framer is particularly well-suited for small teams and freelancers focused on design-centric projects.

Offers a simple, intuitive design interface that’s similar to tools like Figma, making it easy for designers to adopt.

Users appreciate the design flexibility and user-friendliness for creating visually appealing websites.

The community aspect of Framer is growing, providing ample resources for users to learn and collaborate.

Framer’s CMS allows for a variety of dynamic content management capabilities.

Performance issues when dealing with large datasets.

Steep learning curve for beginners due to API complexities.

Customization can be a burden on developers if complex features are needed.

Limited roles in the free version, which can be frustrating.

Strapi's opinionated structure can be limiting compared to more flexible alternatives.

Users find the pricing structure to be restrictive, especially with limited CMS collections for lower tiers.

Framer lacks relational database capabilities, making complex content structures difficult to manage.

Framer lacks advanced features found in competitors like Webflow, which has a significantly higher CMS item limit.

The lack of re-usable components can lead to redundancy and inefficiency in design.

Users report issues with slow updates and functionality, leading to frustrations with the platform.

Framer's basic analytics and SEO features are less comprehensive compared to competitors, limiting performance tracking abilities.

The platform is prone to technical issues that can disrupt project progress, causing dissatisfaction among users.

Expectations for e-commerce solutions are unmet, as Framer does not currently support this functionality.

Requires a paid add-on for features like bot detection and caching, increasing costs unexpectedly.

Users appreciate the ease of creating content with the block editor, allowing for quick layouts and adjustments.

The new rich-text editor allows for more control and flexibility in content management, enhancing the user experience.

Dynamic zones empower editors to create adaptable and creative designs without needing developer intervention.

The latest updates are aimed at improving the editing experience, including inline editing and better integration with front-end frameworks.

Users find the block-based editor better than traditional textarea fields, enhancing productivity in content creation.

Users appreciate the ease of creating and managing collections and items in the CMS.

Framer’s interface is noted as snappy and makes web design enjoyable.

Framer allows easy scalability of designs through its CMS, making it suitable for repetitive content.

The user interface is regarded as superior for interacting with items in the CMS compared to competitors.

Users find it easy to link and create detailed pages from collections.

Importing data into the CMS is user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience.

The rich-text editor's markdown support can be challenging for content editors unfamiliar with markdown.

Some users mentioned difficulty in using the inline media embeds within the new editor features.

Review workflows in Strapi can be cumbersome and are often seen as inadequate for larger teams or complex projects.

Content blocks in the alpha version may not function as intuitively as users expect, leading to frustration.

Limited number of CMS collections based on the pricing tier frustrates users.

Some features lack beginner-friendly guidance, causing confusion among new users.

There are limitations in terms of advanced features like dynamic filtering of items.

Framer’s CMS still lacks the robustness and advanced field types found in other platforms like Webflow.

Users indicate a need for better support and documentation to help navigate complex features.

Some users reported sluggishness in complex edits, despite the overall snappiness.

Easy to get started; many features auto-generate for CRUD operations.

Great for non-developers to manage content due to user management features.

The plugin system allows for easy installation of features like authentication and media management.

Good for rapid prototyping with a modern content management interface.

Supports REST and GraphQL endpoints automatically, reducing backend work.

The content management UI is generally user-friendly, making it easy for content teams.

Framer allows easy sorting of CMS items by various fields like text strings, dates, etc.

CMS allows for dynamic content management with customizable fields to enhance user experience.

The CMS supports filtering collections easily, enhancing content presentation.

Users can import data from CSV files, making it easy to bring content into Framer.

Dynamic references in CMS allow linking of content across collections, making management easier.

Building a CMS page is straightforward, especially for those familiar with design tools like Figma.

Users found the UI clunky, causing inefficiency during large-scale operations.

Version upgrades can be complicated, leading to potential project delays.

Some users experienced slow response times with large data sets.

Lack of database migration support makes larger projects harder to manage.

Strapi's GraphQL integration requires additional handling for errors, unlike REST.

The need for a well-designed data structure is crucial for performance.

Recent updates broke some superfields components, leading to issues in large collections.

Users reported difficulties with updating components after new Framer updates.

Support response times are slow, making troubleshooting issues frustrating for users.

Framer lacks advanced features compared to other CMS solutions, limiting user capabilities.

Integration with third-party tools is limited, affecting the user experience.

Users expressed concerns over the stability of CMS features post-update.