Webflow CMS vs Magnolia

Highly customizable templates available for a unique design.

One of the best tools for creating animations and interactions.

Solid customer support materials available.

Autosave and backup features are robust.

SEO-friendly features are provided out of the box.

Webflow reduces maintenance headaches for developers.

Ease of use for clients is highlighted by many developers.

Magnolia is a highly customizable product ideal for maintaining content across multiple websites.

Users appreciate the high quality in the development of new features and fast response to service requests.

Users find the user-friendly interface to provide a positive experience while managing content.

Magnolia provides strong technical support and rich features such as multilingual support.

The product is recognized for its enterprise-grade reliability and security, making it suitable for large brands.

Content commerce is emphasized for creating captivating shopping experiences that drive conversions.

Cost can be a barrier for small businesses.

The pricing structure is seen as confusing and convoluted.

Limited blogging features for high-output bloggers.

Ecommerce limits can be restrictive in terms of scalability.

Ecommerce features are less developed compared to dedicated ecommerce platforms.

Lack of built-in cookie consent mechanism.

Some users highlight the high costs and less satisfactory after-sale service.

Comments mention that the platform can be heavy and bloated, leading to performance issues.

Some reviewers found the migration to other systems necessary for cost-level agreements.

Users have reported complications in utilizing the system's advanced features effectively.

Integration of diverse tools into the Magnolia system can be complex and require significant technical knowledge.

The platform has limitations for smaller companies due to its complexity and performance requirements.

Users appreciate the overall design and ease of navigating the CMS interface.

The legacy editor simplifies content management for non-technical users.

Users enjoy the visual editing experience, comparing it favorably against other platforms.

Magnolia provides a clear and user-friendly WYSIWYG editor which simplifies content creation.

The content editor framework allows for intuitive app-based content management.

Users appreciate Magnolia's ability to connect to multiple data sources for content reuse.

Magnolia is committed to accessibility, enhancing the UI for all users.

Offers flexibility without the complexity of other CMS platforms like Adobe AEM.

Localization features break the CMS editor, preventing text edits for secondary locales.

Users report severe formatting issues when copying and pasting text in the editor.

Rich text editing has numerous glitches, making it difficult for users to maintain text formatting.

Editors publish changes that can cause issues on the live site, without staging capabilities.

Some users find the overall user interface to be outdated and basic compared to modern standards.

Some users report challenges with the platform's documentation being insufficient for complex features.

Customizability can sometimes create confusion for non-technical users.

The UI and features are still in the process of full accessibility compliance, affecting some users.

Webflow offers quick publishing with no server complexities, enabling faster updates.

Webflow provides a clean, no-code interface with robust integrations for web tools and services.

Webflow makes it easy to create highly customized and responsive sites without extensive coding.

Webflow's CMS makes it easy to publish content and manage simple websites effectively.

Webflow allows for the design and editing of responsive sites with real-time visibility.

Robust SEO tools are built-in, allowing for easy optimization of web pages.

Standardized UI for all integrations makes it easy for team members to learn.

Rich integration API available for deep customization.

Good fit for organizations with existing Java infrastructure.

Offers a comprehensive integration framework.

Flexible and customizable for enterprise-level integration needs.

Integration support for various platforms, enabling omnichannel experiences.

Webflow's learning curve can be steep for complete beginners, requiring some coding understanding.

The extensive pricing structure can confuse users and impact the decision to integrate effectively.

Certain limitations on product counts in eCommerce plans can restrict business growth.

Customization often requires code in scenarios where a user-friendly interface would suffice.

You only have access to email support which can be slow to respond in critical situations.

Webflow does not offer built-in cookie consent tools, making compliance difficult.

Requires significant engineering support for customizations, limiting flexibility for non-technical users.

Users reported that deeper functionalities may need extensive configuration.

Some find it less user-friendly compared to other CMS solutions like Contentful or Strapi.

Integration complexities can arise, especially when extending functionalities.

The learning curve can be steep for non-technical users trying to utilize all features.

Navigation of API and integration points can be overwhelming without prior knowledge.