Sitecore (XM Cloud) vs ButterCMS
Compare Sitecore (XM Cloud) and ButterCMS for blogs. Find out how the features, pricing & plans differs and which technology is best for you!
Sitecore (XM Cloud)
Create, manage, and deliver personalized customer experiences everywhere, lightning-fast. It's how a CMS should be.
ButterCMS
A seamless CMS with a blazing fast API and marketing dashboard. Stop wasting dev time and free your marketers from your legacy CMS.
Headless CMS Features
Sitecore (XM Cloud)'s Headless CMS Features
Not optimized for blogging experience
Complex to integrate
Complex to manage content
Complex to manage images
Image served via CDN
Headless mode available
Blog on subdomain available
Blog on subdirectory available
ButterCMS's Headless CMS Features
Not optimized for blogging experience
Complex to integrate
Complex to manage content
Complex to manage images
Image served via CDN
Headless mode available
Blog on subdomain available
Blog on subdirectory available
Looking for a better alternative to Sitecore (XM Cloud) & ButterCMS? Try Wisp.
Wisp is the best solution for blogging. Try it free today!
Pricing & Plans
Sitecore (XM Cloud)'s Pricing
Custom
$NaN / custom
- Contact sales for pricing
ButterCMS's Pricing
ButterCMS Micro
$119 / month
- 3 Users
- 50 Blog Posts
ButterCMS Startup
$239 / month
- Unlimited Users
- 300 Blog Posts
ButterCMS Small Business
$449 / month
- Unlimited Users
- 600 Blog Posts
Choose Sitecore (XM Cloud) or ButterCMS?
Why choose Sitecore (XM Cloud)?
Sitecore is a robust enterprise CMS that offers a wide range of features for creating and managing content. However, its high price point and complex setup make it more suitable for large organizations with dedicated IT teams.
Why choose ButterCMS?
ButterCMS is a great choice for developers and teams looking to build headless or decoupled applications with a robust content management system. However, its pricing structure may not be suitable for individuals or small teams with limited budgets.
Compare with other technologies
Sitecore (XM Cloud) Alternatives