Medium vs Crafter CMS

Easy to use and supportive community for writers.

Valuable learning resource for data science topics.

Potential for writers to earn income from their articles.

A community where writers can showcase their talent.

Variety of topics and user engagement.

Good platform for beginner writers to start their journey.

Craft CMS offers robust multilingual support and a powerful Matrix field type that allows for endless customization.

Craft CMS provides a better development experience with a clean canvas for template development compared to WordPress.

Craft’s custom fields and UI are praised for their intuitive design, making it easier to manage content types effectively.

Poor customer service and high volume of bots.

Difficulties with subscriptions and account management.

Frustration with content quality and relevance.

Management's lack of communication with users.

Quality of articles varies, with many being superficial or repetitive.

Frustration with the paywall.

The Craft CMS update process is described as inconsistent and often problematic, causing frustration during updates.

Getting support for Craft and developer availability is limited compared to WordPress, making it more challenging to find help when needed.

Users cite difficulty with importing content into Craft, citing bugs that can lead to formatting issues in WYSIWYG fields.

The complexity of developing custom functionalities in Craft compared to WordPress is a common critique among developers.

Some developers express a preference for the Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) in WordPress, which they find more powerful and user-friendly than Craft's offerings.

Users appreciate the autosave feature, although it can be confusing if they don't know if their story is saved.

The editor allows for flexibility in content creation, which is beneficial for writers.

Medium's editor is seen as a good platform for building a portfolio and gaining a following.

A redesign in the editing experience aims to make tool accessibility clearer for users.

Successful articles often include personalized insights, enhancing the editorial experience.

Users can achieve significant views and earnings from well-promoted articles.

Craft's author experience is exceptional, featuring a straightforward fields and sections structure that simplifies content management.

Craft's editor provides a side-by-side view that updates in real-time as content is edited, enhancing the authoring experience.

Craft's handling of entry relations is smoother than in WordPress, allowing for more intuitive linking of content.

Craft's built-in Feed Me component allows easy content import from various formats, simplifying data management for authors.

Craft allows for easy multi-site management and localization, which is less complex compared to other CMSs.

The database schema in Craft can be saved as a YAML file, allowing for easier environment synchronization during development.

Many users find the editing functions confusing and buried in the interface.

The publication management interface is not intuitive, making it hard for editors to navigate.

Writers often struggle to gain visibility without existing followings.

Users express frustration with the platform's promotional aspects, feeling it's a gamble.

New writers may not have enough visibility to attract readers, making articles feel unsupported.

Users wish for better feedback mechanisms after publishing their articles.

Some marketers find Craft's rigid structure a hindrance, as it requires developer intervention for content updates.

A common complaint is the lack of out-of-the-box SEO tools comparable to plugins like Yoast on WordPress.

Craft's customization can lead to complexity, and some users may feel overwhelmed by the features available to developers.

Despite Craft's advantages, its smaller community often limits the resources available compared to more established CMS platforms.

Some users report dissatisfaction with Craft's plugin ecosystem, particularly regarding support and updates for third-party plugins.

Critics mention Craft's pricing model as a barrier, as ongoing costs can accumulate significantly, especially for teams on a budget.

Wagtail's admin interface can coexist with existing Django admin interfaces, facilitating integration.

Payload CMS allows flexible configurations when setting up in existing environments.

Middleware setup within the community is being continuously improved, showing commitment.

Good documentation exists for integrating Wagtail with various plugins.

Integration steps for Headless CMS are clear and well-outlined.

Community support and shared experiences provide practical insights.

The blocks structure allows flexibility in building pages.

User-friendly interface for content creation, making it easier for non-technical users to adapt.

Craft allows for the integration of forms through plugins like Formie.

Customization is possible through thousands of available plugins and APIs.

High standards for plugins ensure reliability and security in integrations.

Real-time updates in the editing mode improve workflow.

Django-CMS lacks direct integration guidance for existing Django applications.

Payload requires additional setups for storage which complicates integration.

Payload CMS documentation remains incomplete for advanced integrations.

Missing rich text serializer is a common pain point in Payload integration.

Wagtail’s complex setup can be a drawback for beginners.

Users report difficulties finding quality examples and documentation.

Fewer plugins available compared to WordPress leading to limited out-of-the-box functionality.

The learning curve can be steep for new users.

Dependency on custom integrations for specific features may deter users.

Custom integrations might be needed for connecting to third-party services like Dynamics 365.

Some users consider the initial setup cumbersome despite powerful features.

Some features may require extensive development knowledge for proper implementation.