Crafter CMS vs Caisy

Craft CMS offers robust multilingual support and a powerful Matrix field type that allows for endless customization.

Craft CMS provides a better development experience with a clean canvas for template development compared to WordPress.

Craft’s custom fields and UI are praised for their intuitive design, making it easier to manage content types effectively.

Caisy is a headless CMS that is user-friendly and supports multiple languages, making it easy for content creators to manage their digital content.

The component-based architecture allows for reusability, which is beneficial for users looking to create various page types without starting from scratch.

Caisy's emphasis on multi-tenancy makes it particularly advantageous for agencies, providing seamless management of multiple sites under one roof.

Caisy provides a robust set of features including localization, content scheduling, and versioning which significantly enhance the content management experience.

The auto-save feature for previous versions helps ensure that users can experiment without the risk of losing their work.

The company provides a high level of customer support to aid users with any questions they may have about the product.

The Craft CMS update process is described as inconsistent and often problematic, causing frustration during updates.

Getting support for Craft and developer availability is limited compared to WordPress, making it more challenging to find help when needed.

Users cite difficulty with importing content into Craft, citing bugs that can lead to formatting issues in WYSIWYG fields.

The complexity of developing custom functionalities in Craft compared to WordPress is a common critique among developers.

Some developers express a preference for the Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) in WordPress, which they find more powerful and user-friendly than Craft's offerings.

Users have reported that the documentation could be more comprehensive, making it challenging for new users to fully utilize the CMS.

Some users have mentioned that the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with headless CMS technologies.

The project limitations on lower-tier plans may hinder users who prefer to manage a variety of smaller projects.

The startup status of Caisy means that the user community is still growing, leading to limited peer support compared to larger established CMS platforms.

At this time, Caisy lacks a standalone REST API, which some users have requested for added flexibility.

Some users have expressed a desire for more starter templates to assist with project initiation and user experience enhancement.

Craft's author experience is exceptional, featuring a straightforward fields and sections structure that simplifies content management.

Craft's editor provides a side-by-side view that updates in real-time as content is edited, enhancing the authoring experience.

Craft's handling of entry relations is smoother than in WordPress, allowing for more intuitive linking of content.

Craft's built-in Feed Me component allows easy content import from various formats, simplifying data management for authors.

Craft allows for easy multi-site management and localization, which is less complex compared to other CMSs.

The database schema in Craft can be saved as a YAML file, allowing for easier environment synchronization during development.

The multi-tenancy feature allows efficient management of multiple sites under one roof.

Intuitive schema builder for creating custom content models with various field types, enabling effective content management.

Features a robust image editor for convenient last-minute adjustments during content creation.

Offers auto-saving content during edits, allowing for easy version comparisons.

Aesthetically pleasing and intuitive UI that enhances user experience for content creators.

Comprehensive localization features for managing multilingual content effortlessly.

Some marketers find Craft's rigid structure a hindrance, as it requires developer intervention for content updates.

A common complaint is the lack of out-of-the-box SEO tools comparable to plugins like Yoast on WordPress.

Craft's customization can lead to complexity, and some users may feel overwhelmed by the features available to developers.

Despite Craft's advantages, its smaller community often limits the resources available compared to more established CMS platforms.

Some users report dissatisfaction with Craft's plugin ecosystem, particularly regarding support and updates for third-party plugins.

Critics mention Craft's pricing model as a barrier, as ongoing costs can accumulate significantly, especially for teams on a budget.

Documentation could be improved, making it difficult for newer users to navigate some features.

Some users report a steep learning curve which can deter new users from fully utilizing the platform.

Limited starter templates available, making it harder for new users to begin their projects quickly.

The dashboard layout can feel cluttered, making it hard to access certain fields at a glance.

Lacks a standalone REST API, which some developers may find limiting.

User community is still growing, resulting in slower responses for less common inquiries.

The blocks structure allows flexibility in building pages.

User-friendly interface for content creation, making it easier for non-technical users to adapt.

Craft allows for the integration of forms through plugins like Formie.

Customization is possible through thousands of available plugins and APIs.

High standards for plugins ensure reliability and security in integrations.

Real-time updates in the editing mode improve workflow.

Robust features and user-friendly design enhance integration.

Offers schema builder and easy API integration.

Seamless integration with popular frontend frameworks.

Clear step-by-step guides for frontend integration.

Fewer plugins available compared to WordPress leading to limited out-of-the-box functionality.

The learning curve can be steep for new users.

Dependency on custom integrations for specific features may deter users.

Custom integrations might be needed for connecting to third-party services like Dynamics 365.

Some users consider the initial setup cumbersome despite powerful features.

Some features may require extensive development knowledge for proper implementation.

Documentation is limited and could be improved.

Migrating content can require careful planning and execution.

Learning the system can present a steep learning curve.

Reports of performance issues during integration.