Keystone vs Framer CMS

KeystoneJS allows rapid API development with GraphQL and eliminates boilerplate code, making it efficient for developers.

The platform is favored for its flexibility and ease of integrating with various frontend tools.

Users appreciate the customizability and strong community support for KeystoneJS.

KeystoneJS provides clear documentation for setting up and using the platform, which helps ease the onboarding process for developers.

The intuitive admin UI of KeystoneJS is highlighted as a significant positive by many users.

Many find KeystoneJS advantageous for creating complex relationships between data models due to its Schema design.

Framer combines UX design capabilities with staging and publishing features, making it an excellent web design tool.

Framer is particularly well-suited for small teams and freelancers focused on design-centric projects.

Offers a simple, intuitive design interface that’s similar to tools like Figma, making it easy for designers to adopt.

Users appreciate the design flexibility and user-friendliness for creating visually appealing websites.

The community aspect of Framer is growing, providing ample resources for users to learn and collaborate.

Framer’s CMS allows for a variety of dynamic content management capabilities.

Users have mentioned a steep learning curve for newcomers that may hinder adoption.

Installation issues on certain setups and the dependency on external databases can be a drawback.

Some users have reported performance issues when scaling applications, especially with complex queries.

Limited built-in functionality compared to some other headless CMS platforms may require additional development work.

Integration with frontend frameworks, while possible, may not be as seamless compared to other CMSs like Strapi.

There have been various bug reports that suggest instability for certain features within KeystoneJS.

Users find the pricing structure to be restrictive, especially with limited CMS collections for lower tiers.

Framer lacks relational database capabilities, making complex content structures difficult to manage.

Framer lacks advanced features found in competitors like Webflow, which has a significantly higher CMS item limit.

The lack of re-usable components can lead to redundancy and inefficiency in design.

Users report issues with slow updates and functionality, leading to frustrations with the platform.

Framer's basic analytics and SEO features are less comprehensive compared to competitors, limiting performance tracking abilities.

The platform is prone to technical issues that can disrupt project progress, causing dissatisfaction among users.

Expectations for e-commerce solutions are unmet, as Framer does not currently support this functionality.

Requires a paid add-on for features like bot detection and caching, increasing costs unexpectedly.

KeystoneJS allows customization of the admin UI, enabling users to tailor the interface to their needs.

Users appreciate Keystone's flexible API, which enables easy integration into various applications.

Many developers find KeystoneJS easy to set up and efficient for rapid application development.

The extension capabilities of KeystoneJS are highly regarded, allowing for advanced customization.

Users reported that the autosave feature is a significant advantage during content creation.

Keystone's workflow management features are praised for streamlining content approval processes.

Users appreciate the ease of creating and managing collections and items in the CMS.

Framer’s interface is noted as snappy and makes web design enjoyable.

Framer allows easy scalability of designs through its CMS, making it suitable for repetitive content.

The user interface is regarded as superior for interacting with items in the CMS compared to competitors.

Users find it easy to link and create detailed pages from collections.

Importing data into the CMS is user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience.

Some users find the media management capabilities lacking, particularly in comparison to other CMS options.

Developers struggle with implementing custom fields due to complexity, impacting the user experience.

Users have reported difficulties in managing image assets effectively within Keystone's current setup.

The system lacks intuitive image editing features, complicating the editing process for users.

Some users mentioned the UI feels dated and could benefit from more modern design elements.

Missing advanced media features like bulk uploads and better organization frustrate users.

Limited number of CMS collections based on the pricing tier frustrates users.

Some features lack beginner-friendly guidance, causing confusion among new users.

There are limitations in terms of advanced features like dynamic filtering of items.

Framer’s CMS still lacks the robustness and advanced field types found in other platforms like Webflow.

Users indicate a need for better support and documentation to help navigate complex features.

Some users reported sluggishness in complex edits, despite the overall snappiness.

Developers appreciate the flexibility and control offered by KeystoneJS for custom projects.

The crash course on KeystoneJS provides a step-by-step guide that eases the onboarding process.

The improved migration commands have made database migrations more straightforward and user-friendly.

Keystone's community support proves beneficial for troubleshooting integration issues.

Keystone allows for easy integration of various database systems such as MongoDB and PostgreSQL.

The clear installation process of Keystone is praised, allowing projects to get up and running quickly.

Framer allows easy sorting of CMS items by various fields like text strings, dates, etc.

CMS allows for dynamic content management with customizable fields to enhance user experience.

The CMS supports filtering collections easily, enhancing content presentation.

Users can import data from CSV files, making it easy to bring content into Framer.

Dynamic references in CMS allow linking of content across collections, making management easier.

Building a CMS page is straightforward, especially for those familiar with design tools like Figma.

Some users reported issues with localization support in KeystoneJS.

Users find it difficult to manage many-to-many relationships effectively with Keystone.

Lack of built-in localization features complicates multi-language site setups.

Some developers encounter difficulties with complex setups and configurations for unique use cases.

Certain users found the learning curve steep due to the complexity of the framework.

Users reported issues with integrating third-party plugins without detailed documentation.

Recent updates broke some superfields components, leading to issues in large collections.

Users reported difficulties with updating components after new Framer updates.

Support response times are slow, making troubleshooting issues frustrating for users.

Framer lacks advanced features compared to other CMS solutions, limiting user capabilities.

Integration with third-party tools is limited, affecting the user experience.

Users expressed concerns over the stability of CMS features post-update.