Ghost vs Caisy

Ghost CMS offers a fast and modern writing experience with built-in newsletters, great SEO tools, and strong security features.

Ghost Pro provides a robust user experience compared to self-hosting, offering faster speeds and ease of use without technical maintenance.

Ghost emphasizes a clean editing experience, allowing seamless integration of multimedia and effective SEO practices without the clutter often found in other CMSs.

Ghost CMS users appreciate its focus on content creation and the simplicity of publishing without the overhead of plugins or extensive settings.

Caisy is a headless CMS that is user-friendly and supports multiple languages, making it easy for content creators to manage their digital content.

The component-based architecture allows for reusability, which is beneficial for users looking to create various page types without starting from scratch.

Caisy's emphasis on multi-tenancy makes it particularly advantageous for agencies, providing seamless management of multiple sites under one roof.

Caisy provides a robust set of features including localization, content scheduling, and versioning which significantly enhance the content management experience.

The auto-save feature for previous versions helps ensure that users can experiment without the risk of losing their work.

The company provides a high level of customer support to aid users with any questions they may have about the product.

Customization in Ghost is limited; most advanced changes require coding knowledge, making it less accessible for non-technical users.

Self-hosting Ghost can lead to technical challenges that might overwhelm users without coding skills, affecting performance and uptime.

Ghost lacks built-in features that are common in other CMSs, such as advanced search options and email marketing tools, often requiring third-party integrations.

Users often express difficulty with theme customization and the necessity of understanding coding to make even minor adjustments, leading to frustration.

Users have reported that the documentation could be more comprehensive, making it challenging for new users to fully utilize the CMS.

Some users have mentioned that the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with headless CMS technologies.

The project limitations on lower-tier plans may hinder users who prefer to manage a variety of smaller projects.

The startup status of Caisy means that the user community is still growing, leading to limited peer support compared to larger established CMS platforms.

At this time, Caisy lacks a standalone REST API, which some users have requested for added flexibility.

Some users have expressed a desire for more starter templates to assist with project initiation and user experience enhancement.

Fast blogs with built-in SEO optimization.

Focuses on the writing process with clean UI and markdown support.

Great built-in features for SEO without the need for plugins.

Community feedback highlights simplifying the publishing process.

The multi-tenancy feature allows efficient management of multiple sites under one roof.

Intuitive schema builder for creating custom content models with various field types, enabling effective content management.

Features a robust image editor for convenient last-minute adjustments during content creation.

Offers auto-saving content during edits, allowing for easy version comparisons.

Aesthetically pleasing and intuitive UI that enhances user experience for content creators.

Comprehensive localization features for managing multilingual content effortlessly.

Complicated setup and self-hosting challenges.

Limited built-in features, requiring more coding knowledge for customization.

Need for coding knowledge for theme customization.

Lacks drag and drop capabilities for complex layouts.

Documentation could be improved, making it difficult for newer users to navigate some features.

Some users report a steep learning curve which can deter new users from fully utilizing the platform.

Limited starter templates available, making it harder for new users to begin their projects quickly.

The dashboard layout can feel cluttered, making it hard to access certain fields at a glance.

Lacks a standalone REST API, which some developers may find limiting.

User community is still growing, resulting in slower responses for less common inquiries.

Ghost provides a fast loading time and built-in newsletter without requiring multiple plugins.

Great built-in SEO tools that work well without needing external plugins.

User-friendly editor that focuses on content without distraction, supports markdown and easy embedding.

Users find Ghost faster than WordPress and simpler in terms of setup for content creation.

Ghost handles many essential functions inherently, decreasing the need for plugins.

Ghost has built-in membership features, simplifying monetization without additional installation.

Robust features and user-friendly design enhance integration.

Offers schema builder and easy API integration.

Seamless integration with popular frontend frameworks.

Clear step-by-step guides for frontend integration.

Self-hosting Ghost can get tricky, particularly when integrating with services like Mailgun.

Customization of Ghost themes requires manual coding knowledge, making it difficult for those unfamiliar with code.

Lacks built-in features for typical blogging needs, requiring third-party integrations for some functionalities.

Difficulties managing affiliate links due to limited functionalities for bulk changes in Ghost.

Limited SEO functionalities compared to WordPress, causing challenges in internal linking.

Lack of media library forces users to manage images through SSH, which can be inconvenient.

Documentation is limited and could be improved.

Migrating content can require careful planning and execution.

Learning the system can present a steep learning curve.

Reports of performance issues during integration.