Crafter CMS vs Webflow CMS

Craft CMS offers robust multilingual support and a powerful Matrix field type that allows for endless customization.

Craft CMS provides a better development experience with a clean canvas for template development compared to WordPress.

Craft’s custom fields and UI are praised for their intuitive design, making it easier to manage content types effectively.

Highly customizable templates available for a unique design.

One of the best tools for creating animations and interactions.

Solid customer support materials available.

Autosave and backup features are robust.

SEO-friendly features are provided out of the box.

Webflow reduces maintenance headaches for developers.

Ease of use for clients is highlighted by many developers.

The Craft CMS update process is described as inconsistent and often problematic, causing frustration during updates.

Getting support for Craft and developer availability is limited compared to WordPress, making it more challenging to find help when needed.

Users cite difficulty with importing content into Craft, citing bugs that can lead to formatting issues in WYSIWYG fields.

The complexity of developing custom functionalities in Craft compared to WordPress is a common critique among developers.

Some developers express a preference for the Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) in WordPress, which they find more powerful and user-friendly than Craft's offerings.

Cost can be a barrier for small businesses.

The pricing structure is seen as confusing and convoluted.

Limited blogging features for high-output bloggers.

Ecommerce limits can be restrictive in terms of scalability.

Ecommerce features are less developed compared to dedicated ecommerce platforms.

Lack of built-in cookie consent mechanism.

Craft's author experience is exceptional, featuring a straightforward fields and sections structure that simplifies content management.

Craft's editor provides a side-by-side view that updates in real-time as content is edited, enhancing the authoring experience.

Craft's handling of entry relations is smoother than in WordPress, allowing for more intuitive linking of content.

Craft's built-in Feed Me component allows easy content import from various formats, simplifying data management for authors.

Craft allows for easy multi-site management and localization, which is less complex compared to other CMSs.

The database schema in Craft can be saved as a YAML file, allowing for easier environment synchronization during development.

Users appreciate the overall design and ease of navigating the CMS interface.

The legacy editor simplifies content management for non-technical users.

Users enjoy the visual editing experience, comparing it favorably against other platforms.

Some marketers find Craft's rigid structure a hindrance, as it requires developer intervention for content updates.

A common complaint is the lack of out-of-the-box SEO tools comparable to plugins like Yoast on WordPress.

Craft's customization can lead to complexity, and some users may feel overwhelmed by the features available to developers.

Despite Craft's advantages, its smaller community often limits the resources available compared to more established CMS platforms.

Some users report dissatisfaction with Craft's plugin ecosystem, particularly regarding support and updates for third-party plugins.

Critics mention Craft's pricing model as a barrier, as ongoing costs can accumulate significantly, especially for teams on a budget.

Localization features break the CMS editor, preventing text edits for secondary locales.

Users report severe formatting issues when copying and pasting text in the editor.

Rich text editing has numerous glitches, making it difficult for users to maintain text formatting.

Editors publish changes that can cause issues on the live site, without staging capabilities.

The blocks structure allows flexibility in building pages.

User-friendly interface for content creation, making it easier for non-technical users to adapt.

Craft allows for the integration of forms through plugins like Formie.

Customization is possible through thousands of available plugins and APIs.

High standards for plugins ensure reliability and security in integrations.

Real-time updates in the editing mode improve workflow.

Webflow offers quick publishing with no server complexities, enabling faster updates.

Webflow provides a clean, no-code interface with robust integrations for web tools and services.

Webflow makes it easy to create highly customized and responsive sites without extensive coding.

Webflow's CMS makes it easy to publish content and manage simple websites effectively.

Webflow allows for the design and editing of responsive sites with real-time visibility.

Robust SEO tools are built-in, allowing for easy optimization of web pages.

Fewer plugins available compared to WordPress leading to limited out-of-the-box functionality.

The learning curve can be steep for new users.

Dependency on custom integrations for specific features may deter users.

Custom integrations might be needed for connecting to third-party services like Dynamics 365.

Some users consider the initial setup cumbersome despite powerful features.

Some features may require extensive development knowledge for proper implementation.

Webflow's learning curve can be steep for complete beginners, requiring some coding understanding.

The extensive pricing structure can confuse users and impact the decision to integrate effectively.

Certain limitations on product counts in eCommerce plans can restrict business growth.

Customization often requires code in scenarios where a user-friendly interface would suffice.

You only have access to email support which can be slow to respond in critical situations.

Webflow does not offer built-in cookie consent tools, making compliance difficult.