Contentlayer vs Statamic
Compare Contentlayer and Statamic for blogs. Find out how the features, pricing & plans differs and which technology is best for you!
Contentlayer
Contentlayer is a content SDK that validates and transforms your content into type-safe JSON data you can easily import into your application.
Statamic
Statamic is a modern, clean, and highly adaptable CMS built on Laravel that can run full-stack, headless, on flat files or databases, or as a static site generator.
Headless CMS Features
Contentlayer's Headless CMS Features
Not optimized for blogging experience
Complex to integrate
Complex to manage content
Complex to manage images
Image served via origin server
Headless mode available
Blog on subdomain available
Blog on subdirectory available
Statamic's Headless CMS Features
Not optimized for blogging experience
Complex to integrate
Complex to manage content
Complex to manage images
Image served via CDN
Headless mode available
Blog on subdomain available
Blog on subdirectory available
Looking for a better alternative to Contentlayer & Statamic? Try Wisp.
Wisp is the best solution for blogging. Try it free today!
Pricing & Plans
Contentlayer's Pricing
Open Source
$0 / forever
- Open-source
Statamic's Pricing
Statamic Free
$0 / forever
- 1 user
- Self hosted
Statamic Platform
$7 / user/month
- Unlimited user
- Basic developer support
Statamic pro
$275 / forever
- Unlimited user
- Self hosted
- Basic developer support
Choose Contentlayer or Statamic?
Why choose Contentlayer?
Contentlayer is ideal for projects that prioritize developer experience, offering built-in validations, performance optimizations, and seamless integration with TypeScript for a smooth and simplified content management process. Note that Contentlayer is no longer actively maintained since 24 Apr 2023.
Why choose Statamic?
Statamic is the go-to for developers preferring a file-based CMS that blends traditional content management with modern workflows. It's optimal for smaller projects or teams wanting control without a database's overhead.
Compare with other technologies
Contentlayer Alternatives