TYPO3 vs ButterCMS

TYPO3 is described as a powerful and flexible open-source enterprise CMS.

Some users find TYPO3 has a lot of powerful features for enterprise-level applications.

Some users mention that TYPO3 attempts to follow modern coding standards like PSR.

Experienced web developers may find TYPO3's multifaceted approach beneficial for complex projects.

Some community members appreciate the unique features and extensive functionalities of TYPO3 for large-scale implementations.

User-friendly content types and blog engine make it easier to manage content effectively.

Built-in SEO features that simplify optimization for search engines.

High user ratings for support and ease of use, reflecting a positive user experience.

Offers a clean and intuitive user interface that facilitates easy navigation and content management.

Supports multiple environments for efficient content management and project deployment.

Has a robust media library that simplifies media management and editing.

Many users think TYPO3 is very complicated and non-intuitive for new users.

The documentation and user experience of TYPO3 are described as frustrating and hard to navigate.

Users criticize TYPO3's template system as overly complex and outdated.

The extension builder in TYPO3 is commonly viewed as being outdated and frustrating to use.

Some developers feel that TYPO3's reliance on TypoScript is an unnecessary hurdle.

Limited autosave functionality may lead to data loss during content creation.

Some users find editor options unscrollable, affecting usability.

Limited rich text editing options can be a drawback for content creators.

Scaling content can be challenging as user needs grow.

Initial setup may require extensive developer involvement, complicating the onboarding process for less technical teams.

Cost can be higher due to needing separate payments for developers and hosting infrastructure.

Intuitive onboarding process for new users; easy to manage content with minimal training.

Good media management capabilities for images and files; easy reuse across content.

Support for multilingual setups out-of-the-box, facilitating easy content translation.

Flexible page assembly through modular elements allows for design control by editors.

Clear organizational structure with a hierarchical page system that feels intuitive.

Improved ease of use with recent updates; many features now available without extensive configuration.

The WYSIWYG editor is user-friendly and allows for easy formatting and image handling.

The intuitive interface makes it easy for marketers to create complex pages using drag-and-drop components.

Preview mode and interactive guides enhance the user experience for content creators.

Flexibility in creating custom content types helps teams tailor their content management.

Steep learning curve due to configurations requiring extensive knowledge of TypoScript.

Complexity increases with the need for multi-tasking; users struggle with navigating many configurations at once.

Documentation can be outdated and hard to follow, making the learning process more challenging.

Configuration can feel convoluted due to reliance on multiple files and settings across the system.

Some users find TYPO3's internal structure complex, making it difficult for beginners to navigate.

The need for continuous updates and maintenance can be a major drawback for some users.

Limited to a certain number of content fields even on higher plans, which can be a restriction for larger teams.

The localization and webhook settings are hard to find in the UI, complicating the user experience.

Some users find the UI could be more polished and intuitive for better navigation.

Users expressed a desire for more extensive customization options in the editing interface.

Flexible plugin configurations enhance user experience while integrating.

Seamless integration with tools for content quality and compliance checks directly within TYPO3.

Users find TYPO3’s template engine Fluid easy to integrate with various designs.

Community-driven extensions like 'paste_reference' provide enhanced functionalities with proper integration support.

Development and customization options available for TYPO3 allow for bespoke solutions.

The plugin supports real-time error fixes, enhancing site management efficiency.

ButterCMS is recognized for its fast implementation and ease of use, particularly for marketing teams.

Users found ButterCMS easy to integrate with Rails, emphasizing its clear API and documentation.

The integration process with TailwindCSS and ButterCMS was described as manageable with clear guides available.

Provides extensive SDKs and documentation to facilitate integration with various frameworks.

The CMS offers a user-friendly WYSIWYG editor, simplifying content management for users.

ButterCMS allows easy access and management of media assets via integrations like Cloudinary.

The extensive feature set can be overwhelming for newcomers.

Integrating certain plugins can lead to complexity and potential conflicts.

Some users struggle with the learning curve associated with TYPO3’s capabilities.

Requires constant updates for optimal performance and security on newer TYPO3 versions.

Limited backward compatibility with older TYPO3 versions may create integration issues.

The interface could benefit from more intuitive navigation for settings like localization.

A user highlighted potential difficulties for those new to Rails when integrating a CMS like ButterCMS.

Some users expressed concerns over the complexity of integrating with existing Rails apps instead of building the CMS functionality in Rails.

Despite easy setup, users may find limitations on the number of content fields per plan frustrating.