Sanity vs BlogMaker

Sanity offers a highly customizable solution for complex projects, appealing to developers looking for tailored solutions.

Users appreciate the fair pricing tier of Sanity, making it a solid choice for those on a budget.

Sanity's API-driven architecture provides flexibility and scalability for growing projects.

The potential for integrating various features into a personalized setup is a strong point of Sanity.

Sanity's pricing tiers allow for gradual scaling, providing a low-cost solution with ample room for growth.

The product is seen as capable of handling complex requirements which might not be as straightforward in traditional CMS solutions.

Users appreciate the ease of use and fast setup, highlighting it as a great option to start blogging without technical hassles.

Many reviews emphasize the excellent customer service provided by the BlogMaker team, making the blogging experience smoother.

The platform offers robust features including SEO tools, custom domains, and multi-blog management for a single subscription.

BlogMaker is praised for its effective newsletter feature that helps users engage directly with their audience.

Users commend BlogMaker for its affiliate program and incentives for recommending the service to others.

Some users highlight how BlogMaker helps avoid the technical aspects of blogging, allowing them to focus on content creation instead.

Lack of TypeScript support is seen as a significant drawback, making development cumbersome.

Users report that the flexibility of the CMS can lead to complexity that makes simple tasks more difficult.

The interface and documentation are reportedly difficult to navigate, contributing to a steep learning curve.

Many users express frustration with the complexity of creating back-end structures compared to simpler CMS tools.

The lack of built-in backup features is a recurring complaint among users, making data management stressful.

Sanity may not cater well to smaller businesses or less technical users due to its complexity and configuration requirements.

Several users report poor customer service experiences, citing long response times and lack of proactive help from the team.

A user expressed frustration with the lack of tutorials and guidance on using the platform, especially when issues arose.

Critics point out that while the platform is easy to use, it lacks certain advanced features such as a built-in search function.

Some users mention that the ownership's responses to criticism can come off as unprofessional, suggesting issues with communication.

A user highlighted that the low pricing may correlate with the level of customer service, suggesting hidden costs regarding support.

Potential users are advised to consider other blogging platforms which might offer better support and features for the same price.

Customizable editor interfaces for unique client needs.

Seamless integration with Next.js for dynamic and optimized performance.

Real-time collaboration enhances workflow and content management.

Strong support for asset management, including images and dynamic content.

Well-documented APIs for easy integration and management of assets.

Clear performance metrics with optimized content delivery.

Fast loading times are a highlight for users, ensuring a smooth reading experience.

Built-in newsletter functionality simplifies content distribution for users.

SEO optimization tools are user-friendly, allowing for easy management of SEO settings.

Markdown support is appreciated, speeding up the writing process for advanced users.

Users recommend BlogMaker for its simplicity and user-friendly interface, especially for non-technical users.

The community praises CMS for not requiring HTML editing for post publishing, easing the user experience.

Some users report a steep learning curve due to extensive customization options.

Lack of video support can frustrate users needing comprehensive media options.

Users may experience difficulties with data synchronization and schema updates.

Complex pricing model can confuse new users.

Some new users find the setup and initial configuration challenging.

Integration with Mailgun was challenging, creating delays in functionality for users who self-host.

Users reported poor site availability when using lower-end hosting plans, affecting accessibility.

The steep learning curve when transitioning from other platforms can hinder new users.

SEO plugins are not as intuitive as in other platforms, making it challenging for collaborative environments.

Some users feel overwhelmed by the technical aspects of setting up BlogMaker.

Some users recommend against complex setups, favoring simpler platforms for non-tech users.

Users appreciate Sanity's flexibility and scalability for projects.

Offers a good API-driven free plan that's suitable for small sites.

Users find Sanity's image optimization features impressive.

Well-regarded for its technical capabilities and flexibility for developers.

The user interface is generally liked for its ease in creating and managing content.

Users mention a robust community and resources for troubleshooting.

Ghost enables automated email newsletters without extra steps.

Wix is recommended for quick blog setup; user-friendly and integrates well.

Wix users can access various design options, making it highly customizable.

Some users find the setup to be too technical, especially for smaller sites.

Integration with Next.js can be difficult if you're not familiar with JavaScript.

Limited user authentication options have been noted as a drawback.

Users have complained about slow performance in the UI when handling larger datasets.

Some find documentation lacking in certain areas, leading to confusion during integration.

High costs can be an issue, especially as the project scales beyond free tier limits.

Users face challenges integrating Ghost with Mailgun, leading to site outages.

Ghost can be tricky to set up for self-hosting; may require technical skills.

Wix's AI tools for generating posts may not suit serious bloggers.