Keystatic vs Statamic

Offers first-class CMS experience with TypeScript and support for Markdown, YAML, and JSON.

Integrating Keystatic into an Astro blog is straightforward, and it allows coexistence of new and old content formats.

Rich text editing experience right out of the box with minimal setup.

Supports creating custom fields and components, enhancing the content management experience.

Allows connection to GitHub repositories and local file system for easy content management.

Markdown and JSON support simplifies the content workflow, appealing for technical users.

Statamic is easy to use and visually appealing, based on Laravel and PHP.

Statamic offers a flat-file storage system making data management straightforward and effective for smaller sites.

Statamic allows custom websites and has strong community support.

The documentation and community support for Statamic are strong and helpful.

Statamic provides a modern codebase with robust security standards.

Statamic's built-in features reduce reliance on plugins, simplifying site management.

Limited support for MDX content, which may hinder those with existing MDX setups.

Users may encounter difficulties when setting up environment variables for GitHub integration.

As it is still in experimental phases, users may face bugs or limitations.

The admin UI can become complex when trying to integrate with existing layouts.

Users have mentioned that not all features are fully developed, leading to missing functionalities.

Some advanced features may require more configuration than initially expected.

Statamic lacks the extensive plugin ecosystem of WordPress, which can be a disadvantage for specific functionalities like e-commerce.

Statamic's setup may be complicated for new users, especially on shared hosting.

Some users feel that Statamic's learning curve is steep for those not familiar with Laravel.

The necessity for a higher capability in coding for additional customizations can limit user accessibility.

Statamic's community is growing but can be harder to find developers for compared to WordPress.

While Statamic has robust features, users often compare its adaptability and user-friendliness unfavorably against WordPress.

The integration with Astro is seamless and allows for custom components.

Users appreciate the simple markdown interface that provides flexibility.

Markdown and JSON management allows for easy content updates without confusion.

The ease of managing content in markdown is highlighted.

Keystatic frequently saves drafts, which is helpful for users.

Customizability of the admin UI is frequently appreciated by developers.

Statamic provides a best-in-class authoring experience, making it developer-friendly and highly flexible.

The Bard editor allows creating blocks seamlessly, enhancing the writing experience by providing advanced image management and Markdown support.

Statamic's blueprints enable creating targeted fields for content types, improving the authoring workflow without complicated HTML.

Developers appreciate Statamic's flat-file design as it allows for quick setup and easy content management through Git integration.

Statamic's rich text editor, Bard, provides a structured content management interface that is intuitive for non-technical users.

Statamic allows for client changes to be automatically committed to the Git repository, thus keeping a change history and facilitating easier project management.

Limited support for MDX format caused migration challenges for existing content.

Users faced difficulties with integrating images correctly in their posts.

Keystatic lacks some advanced features expected by users migrating from other CMS.

Users encountered issues with validations on the datetime field.

Users miss the functionality of converting text to links on pasting, which hinders their usual writing speed.

Statamic can feel overwhelming for users unfamiliar with Laravel, thus requiring a learning curve for non-developers.

Some users find Antlers, Statamic's templating language, challenging, preferring to have Blade support instead.

The lack of comprehensive documentation on certain features can be a barrier to effective use for new users.

New users often find the initial setup and dependency management cumbersome, which can be daunting.

Some users express frustration over the learning curve required to become proficient with Statamic compared to more familiar platforms.

Integrating Keystatic with Astro was straightforward and didn't produce installation errors.

Keystatic successfully managed Markdown content without major issues during setup.

Users find Keystatic easy to configure, especially compared to alternatives like Tina CMS.

It is seen as a good git-based CMS with simple integration.

Keystatic allows simple content organization based on user-defined structures.

The flat-file architecture simplifies version control and makes deployments easier.

Integration is smooth for Laravel developers as Statamic is built on Laravel.

Includes a robust CLI to streamline setup and deployment.

Statamic offers a highly flexible authoring experience with Blueprints.

No requirements for a database by default, making it easier for smaller sites.

Statamic's integration can be automated with Git for content changes.

MDX support was initially lacking, causing a shift to other content types.

Encountered difficulties when converting existing content formats and managing schema.

Users reported validation issues when using the admin UI, indicating potential schema misconfigurations.

One user encountered issues with accessing posts in the admin interface due to schema conflicts.

Some users expressed frustration with limited documentation and encountered initial setup issues.

Antlers templating language may require additional learning for new users.

Initial setup might require more technical skills, such as using Composer and command line tools.

Git integration has faced issues with automatic pushes after content changes.

Configuration can be complex for new users adapting from other CMS platforms.

Missing comprehensive documentation for complex features can hinder users.

Non-developers might struggle with initial setup and using the command line interface.