DecapCMS vs Wisp

Decap CMS is praised for its straightforward installation process and its fast, web-based UI that includes rich-text editing and real-time preview capabilities.

The product offers a git-centric workflow that is ideal for static site generation, which helps in tracking, versioning, and managing content changes.

Decap CMS is recognized for cross-platform capabilities, allowing integration with various static site generators and meta-frameworks.

Users can create unlimited custom content types, which adds a level of flexibility not available in many other CMS platforms.

The platform supports multiple languages, making it a good option for international websites.

It provides a simple interface for managing content, which is helpful for developers and content creators without extensive technical knowledge.

Wisp CMS provides a distraction-free editor that is user-friendly and easy to navigate, which simplifies the blogging experience.

React custom component feature allows for easy integration of custom components into articles.

Offers built-in SEO enhancements which help in boosting the visibility and traffic of blogs managed on it.

The integration with Next.js is seamless, making it a great choice for developers working on React applications.

Newly introduced comments feature enhances user engagement allowing for community building around blog content.

Highly praised for its simplicity and effective features, Wisp CMS is recommended for those seeking a hassle-free CMS solution.

Decap CMS may not be ideal for larger or more complex projects due to its feature limitations compared to traditional CMS platforms.

The lack of built-in support for advanced content workflows is seen as a drawback by some users.

Some users note that a solid understanding of Git is necessary to get the most out of Decap CMS, which could deter non-technical users.

Documentation can sometimes be difficult to follow, which may hinder new users during setup and operation.

Continued development and improvements are needed, with bugs that might need addressing as it is still evolving as a platform.

The CMS is less equipped in terms of various integrations compared to more established CMS solutions, making it less versatile in certain scenarios.

While articles can be freely retrieved via the API, there's no user interface for exporting articles via the dashboard.

While Wisp CMS is user-friendly, some users report issues with limited customization options.

Gaps in documentation for newly released features

No enterprise features like SSO, audit logs, etc

Users appreciate the rich-text editing capability and real-time preview feature, enhancing the editing process.

Achieved high user satisfaction scores, indicating a positive reception of its intuitive interface and extensive features.

Highlighted the CMS ability to work seamlessly with various static site generators, enhancing usability for developers and content creators.

Users mentioned ease of configuration and deployment when setting up Decap CMS for Hugo sites, appreciating the flexibility it offers.

Wisp provides a Medium-like editor, making it easy for non-developers to create content without coding.

Users praise Wisp for its distraction-free writing experience and seamless integration with Next.js.

Content creators find Wisp CMS easy to set up, integrating effortlessly into their existing projects.

The platform allows content creators to focus on storytelling without distractions.

Users experience difficulties with the initial setup, indicating that it can be complicated for non-technical users.

Some users reported a lack of polish in the UI, indicating a need for improvement in user experience design.

Concerns over the interface's complexity were raised, suggesting that not all features are intuitive for new users.

Users noted that content management can become cumbersome without clear navigation, leading to frustration during editing.

Simple installation and setup with YAML configuration.

Integrates seamlessly with static site generators like Hugo.

Offers easy integration with static site generators.

Lightweight and minimalist, great for developers.

User interface is easy to navigate for developers.

Version control and Git integration facilitates workflow.

Easy setup with a distraction-free editor interface for users.

Benefits from robust API capabilities for efficient content management.

Built to handle blogging tasks without extensive technical knowledge.

Fast global content delivery via Cloudflare CDN simplifies integration.

Users highlight Wisp's ability to integrate with existing Next.js apps easily.

Offers streamlined content creation and management workflows.

Requires understanding of Git which may be a barrier for non-technical users.

Less user-friendly for non-technical users compared to traditional CMS.

Lacks built-in support for complex content workflows.

Customization can be cumbersome without coding knowledge.

May require additional integration efforts for digital marketing tools.

Limited templates may hinder some users.