Concrete CMS vs BlogMaker

Concrete5 can be picked up by novice site owners in less than an hour, offering robust functionalities.

It features a user-friendly interface allowing users to edit the page directly, simplifying the content management process.

Concrete is secure and designed for users, ensuring modern framework and strong performance.

Offers a robust framework for building custom themes and templates, allowing for unique website designs.

Concrete CMS has comprehensive user permissions management for controlling access and editing rights.

Easily allows the creation and management of multilingual content, catering to global audiences.

Users appreciate the ease of use and fast setup, highlighting it as a great option to start blogging without technical hassles.

Many reviews emphasize the excellent customer service provided by the BlogMaker team, making the blogging experience smoother.

The platform offers robust features including SEO tools, custom domains, and multi-blog management for a single subscription.

BlogMaker is praised for its effective newsletter feature that helps users engage directly with their audience.

Users commend BlogMaker for its affiliate program and incentives for recommending the service to others.

Some users highlight how BlogMaker helps avoid the technical aspects of blogging, allowing them to focus on content creation instead.

Some users expressed concerns around the lack of comprehensive tutorials for Concrete5 compared to WordPress, indicating potential challenges for new users.

Concrete5 may have a steeper learning curve for those transitioning from more popular CMSs like WordPress, which has extensive community support and resources.

Although Concrete5 is powerful, some may find it lacks certain advanced functionalities offered by a broader range of plugins in WordPress.

While Concrete5 offers significant customization, it may not match the extensive functionalities provided by WordPress’s ecosystem.

Some concerns regarding Concrete5's market share and ongoing support were raised, with users wary of potential obsolescence compared to WordPress.

Several users report poor customer service experiences, citing long response times and lack of proactive help from the team.

A user expressed frustration with the lack of tutorials and guidance on using the platform, especially when issues arose.

Critics point out that while the platform is easy to use, it lacks certain advanced features such as a built-in search function.

Some users mention that the ownership's responses to criticism can come off as unprofessional, suggesting issues with communication.

A user highlighted that the low pricing may correlate with the level of customer service, suggesting hidden costs regarding support.

Potential users are advised to consider other blogging platforms which might offer better support and features for the same price.

Users find Concrete5's in-context editing intuitive and easy for non-technical users.

The CMS allows for extensive customization without compromising security.

Many users appreciate the built-in tools and functionality that reduce reliance on plugins.

The platform is said to allow updates in seconds, offering a smooth editing experience.

Users report a very short learning curve, highlighting ease of use even for non-tech-savvy individuals.

The community support is very responsive, which enhances the user experience overall.

Fast loading times are a highlight for users, ensuring a smooth reading experience.

Built-in newsletter functionality simplifies content distribution for users.

SEO optimization tools are user-friendly, allowing for easy management of SEO settings.

Markdown support is appreciated, speeding up the writing process for advanced users.

Users recommend BlogMaker for its simplicity and user-friendly interface, especially for non-technical users.

The community praises CMS for not requiring HTML editing for post publishing, easing the user experience.

Some users reported slow load times when using local setups.

Users expressed frustration over the stagnant development of add-ons in the marketplace.

Documentation is lacking, which adds to setup challenges for new users.

Integration with Mailgun was challenging, creating delays in functionality for users who self-host.

Users reported poor site availability when using lower-end hosting plans, affecting accessibility.

The steep learning curve when transitioning from other platforms can hinder new users.

SEO plugins are not as intuitive as in other platforms, making it challenging for collaborative environments.

Some users feel overwhelmed by the technical aspects of setting up BlogMaker.

Some users recommend against complex setups, favoring simpler platforms for non-tech users.

Ease of adding content blocks for new features.

Google Analytics integration is simple.

Content management is user-friendly for editors and developers.

Robust built-in features often eliminate the need for extensions.

The modular approach simplifies adding new features.

Customization is flexible and manageable for developers.

Ghost enables automated email newsletters without extra steps.

Wix is recommended for quick blog setup; user-friendly and integrates well.

Wix users can access various design options, making it highly customizable.

Complex customizations may require additional coding knowledge.

More complex features can require significant time investment.

Limited blogging capabilities without specific add-ons.

Need for group and permission management might complicate integration.

Potential difficulties in scaling with complex data requirements.

Integration with diverse third-party services requires careful planning.

Users face challenges integrating Ghost with Mailgun, leading to site outages.

Ghost can be tricky to set up for self-hosting; may require technical skills.

Wix's AI tools for generating posts may not suit serious bloggers.