Agility vs Caisy

Agility CMS provides excellent flexibility and scalability.

The system features intuitive editing and allows for significant customization.

Users appreciate its capability to manage content across multiple languages and platforms.

Offers robust marketing features allowing users without coding skills to manage content efficiently.

The platform provides a cloud-native architecture for scalability and performance.

Customer support ratings are high, emphasizing the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team.

Caisy is a headless CMS that is user-friendly and supports multiple languages, making it easy for content creators to manage their digital content.

The component-based architecture allows for reusability, which is beneficial for users looking to create various page types without starting from scratch.

Caisy's emphasis on multi-tenancy makes it particularly advantageous for agencies, providing seamless management of multiple sites under one roof.

Caisy provides a robust set of features including localization, content scheduling, and versioning which significantly enhance the content management experience.

The auto-save feature for previous versions helps ensure that users can experiment without the risk of losing their work.

The company provides a high level of customer support to aid users with any questions they may have about the product.

Some users reported bugs within the application that hinder usability.

Users have mentioned that the initial learning curve can be steep for new users.

Issues with customer support and reliance on third-party developers for problem resolution.

Integration with other software can be complex and requires developers.

Some users experience slow content publication times due to system performance.

Complexities in customization can lead to difficulties without technical assistance.

Users have reported that the documentation could be more comprehensive, making it challenging for new users to fully utilize the CMS.

Some users have mentioned that the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with headless CMS technologies.

The project limitations on lower-tier plans may hinder users who prefer to manage a variety of smaller projects.

The startup status of Caisy means that the user community is still growing, leading to limited peer support compared to larger established CMS platforms.

At this time, Caisy lacks a standalone REST API, which some users have requested for added flexibility.

Some users have expressed a desire for more starter templates to assist with project initiation and user experience enhancement.

The new Web Studio enhances user experience with intuitive navigation and streamlined collaboration features.

Content modeling allows users to define and relate content flexibly, enhancing the overall editing experience.

Users appreciate the collaboration tools and content modeling capabilities as key features of Agility CMS.

Highlighted successful implementations show how companies improved content management using Agility CMS.

High ratings for ease of use and integration support, enhancing the editorial experience for content creators.

Users find the platform easy to use for creating and updating digital content, backed by excellent support.

The multi-tenancy feature allows efficient management of multiple sites under one roof.

Intuitive schema builder for creating custom content models with various field types, enabling effective content management.

Features a robust image editor for convenient last-minute adjustments during content creation.

Offers auto-saving content during edits, allowing for easy version comparisons.

Aesthetically pleasing and intuitive UI that enhances user experience for content creators.

Comprehensive localization features for managing multilingual content effortlessly.

Users report occasional bugs in the application that hinder seamless editing.

Customization can sometimes be challenging, leading to dissatisfaction among some users.

Specific integration features require improvement, which can impact the overall experience.

Some users expressed frustration with complex workflows that can complicate simple tasks.

Limited features for advanced content management tasks are mentioned by some reviewers.

Documentation could be improved, making it difficult for newer users to navigate some features.

Some users report a steep learning curve which can deter new users from fully utilizing the platform.

Limited starter templates available, making it harder for new users to begin their projects quickly.

The dashboard layout can feel cluttered, making it hard to access certain fields at a glance.

Lacks a standalone REST API, which some developers may find limiting.

User community is still growing, resulting in slower responses for less common inquiries.

Agility CMS offers flexible integration capabilities.

Recent collaboration with Netlify enhances integration functionality.

Users appreciate the user-friendly interface of Agility CMS for integration.

Integrates smoothly with Next.js, enhancing development experience.

Agility CMS users find it easy to work with the platform for content management tasks.

Good for non-developers to manage content with some technical support.

Robust features and user-friendly design enhance integration.

Offers schema builder and easy API integration.

Seamless integration with popular frontend frameworks.

Clear step-by-step guides for frontend integration.

Some users report bugs in the app that impede smoother integration.

Integration is reported to be costly, leading some users to hesitate.

Users mention difficulties with certain customization aspects of the integration.

Complexity in handling integrations can be a challenge for beginners.

Users face challenges during integration for more extensive projects.

Some users feel that documentation for integrating with Agility CMS can be lacking.

Documentation is limited and could be improved.

Migrating content can require careful planning and execution.

Learning the system can present a steep learning curve.

Reports of performance issues during integration.